Hi,
On 2021-05-07 12:03:36 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> It might be interesting for us as developers, but not to the vast
> majority of our users. Most of those get their startup scripts from
> our packagers -- so maybe we should encourage packagers to provide it,
> like they do for PostgreSQL
Hi,
On 2021-05-05 18:34:36 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Is this really a problem we should fix ourselves? Most daemon-managers
> today will happily be configured to automatically restart a daemon on
> failure with a single setting since a long time now. E.g. in systemd
> (which most linuxen use
On 05.05.21 19:12, Robert Haas wrote:
Maybe, but if that's really a non-problem, why does postgres itself
restart, and have facilities to write and rotate log files?
I think because those were invented at a time when the operating system
facilities were less useful. And the log management f
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 5:43 AM Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 10:42 PM David Fetter wrote:
> > We do use at least one bit and piece from around the internet to make
> > our software usable, namely libreadline, the absence of which make
> > psql pretty much unusable.
FWIW, we did g
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 7:12 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:34 PM Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Is this really a problem we should fix ourselves? Most daemon-managers
> > today will happily be configured to automatically restart a daemon on
> > failure with a single setting since
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 10:42 PM David Fetter wrote:
> We do use at least one bit and piece from around the internet to make
> our software usable, namely libreadline, the absence of which make
> psql pretty much unusable.
I'm not talking about dependent libraries. We obviously have to depend
on s
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 01:12:03PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:34 PM Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Is this really a problem we should fix ourselves? Most daemon-managers
> > today will happily be configured to automatically restart a daemon on
> > failure with a single setti
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:34 PM Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Is this really a problem we should fix ourselves? Most daemon-managers
> today will happily be configured to automatically restart a daemon on
> failure with a single setting since a long time now. E.g. in systemd
> (which most linuxen uses
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 5:04 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>
> You might want to use pg_receivewal to save all of your WAL segments
> somewhere instead of relying on archive_command. It has, at the least,
> the advantage of working on the byte level rather than the segment
> level. But it seems to me that
On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 11:04 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> You might want to use pg_receivewal to save all of your WAL segments
> somewhere instead of relying on archive_command. It has, at the least,
> the advantage of working on the byte level rather than the segment
> level. But it seems to me that
You might want to use pg_receivewal to save all of your WAL segments
somewhere instead of relying on archive_command. It has, at the least,
the advantage of working on the byte level rather than the segment
level. But it seems to me that it is not entirely suitable as a
substitute for archiving, fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
