Bonjour Michaël,
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMN686ExUKturcWp4POaaVz3gR3hauSGBjOCd0E-Jh1zEXqf_Q%40mail.gmail.com
Since then, the patch is failing to apply. As this got zero activity
for the last six months, I am marking the entry as returned with
feedback in the CF app.
Hmmm… I
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:42:49PM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> Regarding Windows testing you may find this thread useful:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMN686ExUKturcWp4POaaVz3gR3hauSGBjOCd0E-Jh1zEXqf_Q%40mail.gmail.com
Since then, the patch is failing to apply. As this got zero ac
On 3/27/20 6:25 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
Patch v5 is a rebase with some adjustements.
This patch is failing on the Windows build:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.85698
I'm not sure if this had been fixed in v3 and this is a new issue or
if it has bee
Patch v5 is a rebase with some adjustements.
This patch is failing on the Windows build:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.85698
I'm not sure if this had been fixed in v3 and this is a new issue or if it
has been failing all along. Either way, it should b
Hi Fabien,
On 1/9/20 5:04 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
Patch v4 is a just a rebase.
Patch v5 is a rebase with some adjustements.
This patch is failing on the Windows build:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.85698
I'm not sure if this had been fixed in v3 an
Patch v4 is a just a rebase.
Patch v5 is a rebase with some adjustements.
--
Fabien.diff --git a/src/bin/pgbench/Makefile b/src/bin/pgbench/Makefile
index f402fe7b91..e1d3ef9bb3 100644
--- a/src/bin/pgbench/Makefile
+++ b/src/bin/pgbench/Makefile
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ include $(top_builddir)/src/
Patch v4 is a just a rebase.
--
Fabien.diff --git a/src/bin/pgbench/Makefile b/src/bin/pgbench/Makefile
index f402fe7b91..e1d3ef9bb3 100644
--- a/src/bin/pgbench/Makefile
+++ b/src/bin/pgbench/Makefile
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ include $(top_builddir)/src/Makefile.global
OBJS = \
$(WIN32RES) \
expr
Hello Thomas,
I noticed, but I do not have any windows host so I cannot test locally.
The issue is how to do a mutex on Windows, which does not have pthread so
it has to be emulated. I'll try again by sending a blind update to the
patch and see how it goes.
If you have the patience and a git
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:57 PM Fabien COELHO wrote:
> I noticed, but I do not have any windows host so I cannot test locally.
>
> The issue is how to do a mutex on Windows, which does not have pthread so
> it has to be emulated. I'll try again by sending a blind update to the
> patch and see how i
Some windows-specific hacks are note tested.
Somehow this macro hackery has upset the Windows socket headers:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.55019
I noticed, but I do not have any windows host so I cannot test locally.
The issue is how to do a mutex
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:54 AM Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Some windows-specific hacks are note tested.
Somehow this macro hackery has upset the Windows socket headers:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.55019
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
Hello pgdevs,
The attached patch improves pgbench variable management as discussed in:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/alpine.DEB.2.21.1904081752210.5867@lancre
As discussed there as well, the overall effect is small compared to libpq
& system costs when pgbench is talking to a pos
12 matches
Mail list logo
