On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:05:42PM -0700, Michael Paquier wrote:
> As far as I can see, the proposal is not cold to death and could have a
> future, so I'll begin a new thread with a more complete patch.
Done. Let's move the discussion here then:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/201809060148
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:20:03PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Sep-05, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > It would be better to start a new thread rather than posting
> > a new patch, but I'd rather take the temperature first.
>
> Slightly feverish, it appears.
As far as I can see, the proposa
On 2018-Sep-05, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:39:50AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Should this be used in src/test/modules/{brin,test_commit_ts} also?
>
> Hmm, I have not thought those two ones. commit_ts relies on REGRESS to
> be defined so as it does its cleanup. bri
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:39:50AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Should this be used in src/test/modules/{brin,test_commit_ts} also?
> Hmm, I have not thought those two ones. commit_ts relies on REGRESS to
> be defined so as it does its cleanup. brin is more interest
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:39:50AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Should this be used in src/test/modules/{brin,test_commit_ts} also?
Hmm, I have not thought those two ones. commit_ts relies on REGRESS to
be defined so as it does its cleanup. brin is more interesting, it
directly quotes that it
On 2018-Sep-04, Michael Paquier wrote:
> OK. I have dug into that, and finished with the attached. What do you
> think? One thing is that the definition of submake is moving out of
> REGRESS, and .PHONY gets defined.
Should this be used in src/test/modules/{brin,test_commit_ts} also?
Why do y
