On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:23 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 03:30:22PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Sorry that I didn't get to this before you did -- I was on PTO on
> > Friday and did not work on the weekend.
>
> My apologies, Robert. It seems that I have been too much has
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 03:30:22PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Sorry that I didn't get to this before you did -- I was on PTO on
> Friday and did not work on the weekend.
My apologies, Robert. It seems that I have been too much hasty
then. There are so many things going around lately, it is hard
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:27 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> After sleeping on it, let's live with just switching to nleft in the
> message, without openLogOff as that's the second time folks complain
> about the previous code. So I just propose the attached. Robert,
> others, any objections? Perhap
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:27:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> After sleeping on it, let's live with just switching to nleft in the
> message, without openLogOff as that's the second time folks complain
> about the previous code. So I just propose the attached. Robert,
> others, any objection
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:11:16PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> If you want to keep this formulation, that's fine for me. However you
> should really change it to nleft as you suggest, and not keep nbytes.
After sleeping on it, let's live with just switching to nleft in the
message, without op
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:03:19AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Oh, sorry, I didn't see the earlier thread. You're right that this is
> messed up: if we're going to report startOffset rather than
> openLogOff, we need to report nleft rather than bytes. I would prefer
> to change nbytes -> nleft ra
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 6:53 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 02:47:16PM +, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Removed unused variable, openLogOff.
>
> Is that right for the report if data is written in chunks? The same
> patch has been proposed a couple of weeks ago, and I commented ab
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 02:47:16PM +, Robert Haas wrote:
> Removed unused variable, openLogOff.
Is that right for the report if data is written in chunks? The same
patch has been proposed a couple of weeks ago, and I commented about
it as follows:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2019012