On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 at 16:49, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Dear Michael,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> > So, what you are doing here is changing the behavior of the check in
> > recoveryStopsAfter(), with the addition of one exit path based on
> > EndRecPtr if recovery_target_inclusive i
Dear Michael,
Sorry for the late reply.
> So, what you are doing here is changing the behavior of the check in
> recoveryStopsAfter(), with the addition of one exit path based on
> EndRecPtr if recovery_target_inclusive is false, to leave a bit
> earlier in case if we don't have a follow-up recor
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 05:04:37AM +, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> While working on [1] I found the point. When recovery_target_lsn is specified
> and
> recovery_target_inclusive is false, recoveryStopsAfter() cannot return true.
>
> /* Check if the target LSN has been reached */
>
Hi hackers,
While working on [1] I found the point. When recovery_target_lsn is specified
and
recovery_target_inclusive is false, recoveryStopsAfter() cannot return true.
```
/* Check if the target LSN has been reached */
if (recoveryTarget == RECOVERY_TARGET_LSN &&
