On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 08:18:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Chao Li writes:
>> On Oct 15, 2025, at 23:50, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>>> This was first added in commit 2f17844 (v11), and AFAICT it was only used
>>> for a variable named update_tuple_routing_needed in ExecInitModifyTable(),
>>> which wa
> On Oct 15, 2025, at 23:50, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>
> This was first added in commit 2f17844 (v11), and AFAICT it was only used
> for a variable named update_tuple_routing_needed in ExecInitModifyTable(),
> which was removed by commit c5b7ba4 (v14). Any objections to removing it
> now?
>
> -
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 08:18:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Chao Li writes:
>> On Oct 15, 2025, at 23:50, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>>> This was first added in commit 2f17844 (v11), and AFAICT it was only used
>>> for a variable named update_tuple_routing_needed in ExecInitModifyTable(),
>>> which wa
17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Bossart
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:40:18 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] remove partColsUpdated
---
src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c | 4
src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c| 2 --
src/backend/optimizer/util/inherit.c| 10 --
src/back
Chao Li writes:
> On Oct 15, 2025, at 23:50, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> This was first added in commit 2f17844 (v11), and AFAICT it was only used
>> for a variable named update_tuple_routing_needed in ExecInitModifyTable(),
>> which was removed by commit c5b7ba4 (v14). Any objections to removing i
