On 2021/09/15 21:27, Ranier Vilela wrote:
I found this in the commit log in the patch. I agree that these patches
are refactoring ones. But I'm thinking that it's worth doing back-patch,
to make future back-patching easy. Thought?
Thanks for picking this.
Pushed. Thanks!
Regard
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 2:08 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > I have handled this in the patch attached.
> >
>
> 4.
> AlterPublicationSchemas()
> {
> ..
> + /*
> + * If the table option was not specified remove the existing tables
> + * from the
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:40 AM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> > I don't have any better ideas to offer :-( ... but I very much fear
> > that the approach proposed here is a dead end.
>
> I unfortunately don't see a good way forward without changing the way we do
> parsing on a more fundamental level :(
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:53:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jaime Casanova writes:
> > Here's another crash caught by sqlsmith.
>
> Fun. Looks like it fails back to v12, but not in v11,
> so it's some optimization we added in v12 that's at fault.
It seems to be a regression (?) in 12.6 (2021-02
Hi
In yesterday's patch I used strndup, which is not available on win. I am
sending update when I used pnstrdup instead.
Regards
Pavel
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml
index 7682226b99..1b74c0eadd 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dump.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 8:45 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 6:06 PM Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-Sep-15, vignesh C wrote:
> > > The patch
> > > Generic_object_type_parser_002_table_schema_publication.patch has the
> > > changes that were used to handle the parsing.
On 2021/09/16 12:36, kuroda.hay...@fujitsu.com wrote:
you mean that this is not strtoXXX, right?
Yes, the behavior of process_log_prefix_padding() is different from
strtoint() or pg_strtoint32(). For example, how the heading space
characters are handled is different. If we use the name like
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 4:45 PM Greg Nancarrow wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 6:38 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > I have handled this in the patch attached.
> >
>
> Regarding the following function in the v28-0002 patch:
>
> +/*
> + * Check if the relation schema is member of the schema list.
>
Hi
looks so this patch is broken again. Please, can you do rebase?
Regards
Pavel
čt 16. 9. 2021 v 8:28 odesílatel wenjing napsal:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
101 - 109 of 109 matches
Mail list logo