Don Baccus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 04:42 AM 12/3/00 +, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> >> This statement of yours kinda belittles the work done over the past
> >> few years by volunteers.
> >
> >imho it does not,
>
> Sure it does. You in essence are saying that "advanced replication is so
> There is risk here. It isn't so much in the fact that PostgreSQL, Inc
> is doing a couple of modest closed-source things with the code. After
> all, the PG community has long acknowleged that the BSD license would
> allow others to co-op the code and commercialize it with no obligations.
>
>
At 09:29 PM 12/2/00 -0800, Adam Haberlach wrote:
>> Red herring, and you know it. The question isn't whether or not your business
>> generates income, but how it generates income.
>
> So far, Open Source doesn't. The VA Linux IPO made ME some income,
>but I'm not sure that was part of thei
At 09:56 PM 12/2/00 -0700, Ron Chmara wrote:
...
>And I really havn't seen much in the way of full featured products, complete
>with printed docs, 24 hour support, tutorials, wizards, templates, a company
>to sue if the code causes damage, GUI install, setup, removal, etc. etc. etc.
>
>Want to ma
At 04:42 AM 12/3/00 +, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>> This statement of yours kinda belittles the work done over the past
>> few years by volunteers.
>
>imho it does not,
Sure it does. You in essence are saying that "advanced replication is so
hard that it could only come about if someone were wi
mlw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ drop function on which a functional index is based ]
> and strange things start to happen.
All I get is messages like
ERROR: fmgr_info: function 402432: cache lookup failed
which is about what I'd expect. If you've seen a coredump in
this situation, l
>And I really havn't seen much in the way of full featured products, complete
>with printed docs, 24 hour support, tutorials, wizards, templates, a company
>to sue if the code causes damage, GUI install, setup, removal, etc. etc. etc.
Mac OS X.
;-)
-pmb
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"4 out of 5 people
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > PostgreSQL, Inc perhaps has that as a game plan.
> > I'm not so much concerned about exactly what PG, Inc is planning to offer
> > as a proprietary piece - I'm purist enough that I worry about what this
> > signals for their future direction.
> Hmm. What has kept repl
> This statement of yours kinda belittles the work done over the past
> few years by volunteers.
imho it does not, and if somehow you can read that into it then you have
a much different understanding of language than I. I *am* one of those
volunteers, and know that the hundreds of hours I have c
Given the name of a table, I need to find all foreign keys in that table
and the table/column that they refer to, along with the action to be
performed on update/delete. The following query works, but only when
there is 1 foreign key in the table, when there is more than 2 it grows
exponentially
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 07:32:14PM -0800, Don Baccus wrote:
> At 02:58 AM 12/3/00 +, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> >> PostgreSQL, Inc perhaps has that as a game plan.
> >> I'm not so much concerned about exactly what PG, Inc is planning to offer
> >> as a proprietary piece - I'm purist enough that
An obscure series of events seems to cause a core dump and OID
corruption:
-- tolower function for varchar
create function varchar_lower(varchar) returns varchar
as '/usr/local/lib/pgcontains.so', 'pglower'
language 'c';
create index ztables_title_ndx on ztitles ( varchar_lowe
At 02:58 AM 12/3/00 +, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>> PostgreSQL, Inc perhaps has that as a game plan.
>> I'm not so much concerned about exactly what PG, Inc is planning to offer
>> as a proprietary piece - I'm purist enough that I worry about what this
>> signals for their future direction.
>
>Hm
> PostgreSQL, Inc perhaps has that as a game plan.
> I'm not so much concerned about exactly what PG, Inc is planning to offer
> as a proprietary piece - I'm purist enough that I worry about what this
> signals for their future direction.
Hmm. What has kept replication from happening in the past?
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:56:57PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would rip it out.
>
> I thought about that too, but was afraid to suggest it ;-)
>
> How many people are actually using COPY BINARY?
>
I have used it, I don't think I'm actually using
At 06:27 PM 12/2/00 -0500, Michael Fork wrote:
>I am trying to set the update and delete rules that are returned from the
>ODBC driver and the spec has the following to say:
>
>SQL_NO_ACTION: If a delete of a row in the referenced table would cause a
>"dangling reference" in the referencing table
I am trying to set the update and delete rules that are returned from the
ODBC driver and the spec has the following to say:
SQL_NO_ACTION: If a delete of a row in the referenced table would cause a
"dangling reference" in the referencing table (that is, rows in the
referencing table would have n
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 03:47:19PM -0800, Adam Haberlach wrote:
> >
> > Where's the damn core code? I've seen a number of examples already of
> > people asking about remote access/replication function, with an eye
> > toward implementing it, and being told "PostgreSQL, Inc. is working
> > on that
At 01:52 PM 12/2/00 -0800, Tom Samplonius wrote:
> I doubt that. There is an IB (Interbase) replication option today, but
>you must purchase it. That isn't so bad actually. PostgreSQL looks to be
>going that way too: base functionality is open source, periphial
>companies make money selling
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
...
> Will Great Bridge step to the plate and fund a truly open source alternative,
> leaving us with a potential code fork? If IB gets its political problems
> under control and developers rally around it, two years is going to be a
> long time to just sit
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 03:51:15PM -0600, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 11:31:37AM -0800, Don Baccus wrote:
> > At 05:42 PM 12/2/00 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > >Don Baccus writes:
> > >
> > >> Exactly what is PostgreSQL, Inc doing in this area?
> > >
> > >Good question.
At 03:51 PM 12/2/00 -0600, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
>"We expect to have the source code tested and ready to contribute to
>the open source community before the middle of October. Until that time
>we are considering requests from a number of development companies and
>venture capital groups to joi
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 11:31:37AM -0800, Don Baccus wrote:
> At 05:42 PM 12/2/00 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >Don Baccus writes:
> >
> >> Exactly what is PostgreSQL, Inc doing in this area?
> >
> >Good question... See http://www.erserver.com/.
>
>
> Boy, I can just imagine the uproar thi
At 05:42 PM 12/2/00 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Don Baccus writes:
>
>> Exactly what is PostgreSQL, Inc doing in this area?
>
>Good question... See http://www.erserver.com/.
"Advanced Replication and Distributed Information capabilities are also under
development to meet specific
business
From: "Nathan Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 07:02:01PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
[snip]
> The logging in 7.1 protects transactions against many sources of
> database crash, but not necessarily against OS crash, and certainly
> not against power failure. (You might
Don Baccus writes:
> Exactly what is PostgreSQL, Inc doing in this area?
Good question... See http://www.erserver.com/.
> I've not seen discussions about it here, and the two of the three most
> active developers (Jan and Tom) work for Great Bridge, not PostgreSQL,
> Inc...
Vadim Mikheev and
26 matches
Mail list logo
