On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 05:57:16PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > No, I think there is another problem. How about something without
> > > selects:
> >
> > > $ psql -c 'delete from pk; delete from xx;'
> > > ERROR: Relat
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Sure, because the transaction is rolled back. The whole string
>> is executed in one transaction. You will definitely break existing
>> applications if you change that.
> Applications that rely on this behaviour are broken. It was always said
> t
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, I think there is another problem. How about something without
> selects:
> $ psql -c 'delete from pk; delete from xx;'
> ERROR: Relation 'xx' does not exist
> "pk" exists, but nothing is deleted.
Sure, because the transaction is rolled back.
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> psql -c 'select * from pg_class; select * from no_such_table;'
> Shouldn't this at least give me the result of the first select before
> aborting the second?
The behavior you are complaining of is not the backend's fault.
The reason it acts that way
