Re: [HACKERS] OpenFTS (Open Source Full Text Search engine) pre-announce

2001-08-09 Thread Anatoly K. Lasareff
> "OB" == Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: OB> Hi, OB> I'm about to announce a release of OpenFTS search engine. OB> Short blurb: OB> OpenFTS (Open Source Full Text Search engine) OB> is an advanced PostgreSQL-based search engine OB> that provides online indexing of data and

[HACKERS] PL/pgSQL bug?

2001-08-09 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
It seems that sometimes uncommitted data (dirty data?) could be seen in PL/pgSQL function. Below is a sample script to reproduce the problem: If you execute "SELECT myftest(1)" concurrently, you will see the subselect in the SELECT INTO... will produce: ERROR: More than one tuple returned by a

Re: [HACKERS] Re: WIN32 errno patch

2001-08-09 Thread Mikhail Terekhov
Tom Lane wrote: > > Mikhail Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > One can't just #undef errno on windows because it is defined as > > follows: > > I was wondering if Windows might play any games with errno. However, > we've had at least one instance of "errno = 0;" in the libpq sources > s

Re: [HACKERS] Re: WIN32 errno patch

2001-08-09 Thread Tom Lane
Mikhail Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One can't just #undef errno on windows because it is defined as > follows: I was wondering if Windows might play any games with errno. However, we've had at least one instance of "errno = 0;" in the libpq sources since 7.0 or before, and no one has

Re: [HACKERS] Re: WIN32 errno patch

2001-08-09 Thread Mikhail Terekhov
One can't just #undef errno on windows because it is defined as follows: #if defined(_MT) || defined(_DLL) extern int * __cdecl _errno(void); #define errno (*_errno()) #else /* ndef _MT && ndef _DLL */ extern int errno; #endif /* _MT || _DLL */ So when building a dll or a multithreaded ap

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
> I said: > > Okay, I'll wrap up the last couple of back-patches this evening... > > Done. A couple of the patches that I had my eye on turned out not to be > relevant to 7.1 (they were fixes in new code). So attached is the > current list of 7.1.2 -> 7.1.3 changes. Bruce, are you going to han

Re: [HACKERS] GiST docs

2001-08-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Oleg Bartunov writes: > we got a spare time (well, hope so) and > we'are about to document GiST interface - sort of guide with intro, > examples and programming notices. I think it's worth to include it > into documentation for 7.2 release. What's a procedure for > taking part in documentation pr

[HACKERS] GiST docs

2001-08-09 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Hi, we got a spare time (well, hope so) and we'are about to document GiST interface - sort of guide with intro, examples and programming notices. I think it's worth to include it into documentation for 7.2 release. What's a procedure for taking part in documentation project ? What should be a sty

Re: [HACKERS] OpenFTS (Open Source Full Text Search engine) pre-announce

2001-08-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
GREAT! We need to get this information to people so they know it is available. It is a major feature that few people know exists. > Hi, > > I'm about to announce a release of OpenFTS search engine. > > Short blurb: > > OpenFTS (Open Source Full Text Search engine) > is an advanced Post

[HACKERS] OpenFTS (Open Source Full Text Search engine) pre-announce

2001-08-09 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Hi, I'm about to announce a release of OpenFTS search engine. Short blurb: OpenFTS (Open Source Full Text Search engine) is an advanced PostgreSQL-based search engine that provides online indexing of data and relevance ranking for database searching. Close integration with database al

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-09 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think we are on hold for Hiroshi, right? Yes. I believe I know which patch he's referring to --- it's the only change in src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c since 7.1. If he hasn't committed in a few hours I can take care of back-patching it. It must be pu

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
I think we are on hold for Hiroshi, right? > > go for it, and I'll try and do up a v7.1.3 during the day tomorrow ... > > On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> current list of 7.1.2 -> 7.1.3 changes. Bruce, are you going to handle > > >> t

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > > > > The list looks good to me as far as doing a v7.1.3 ... anyone object to > > it? > > Not me, but I'm curious as to how far away 7.2 is? Oct-ish sometime ... > > Vince. > > > > > On Tue, 7 Aug

Re: [HACKERS] To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

2001-08-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
go for it, and I'll try and do up a v7.1.3 during the day tomorrow ... On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> current list of 7.1.2 -> 7.1.3 changes. Bruce, are you going to handle > >> the documentation updates and release branding? > > > Yes, jus