I apologize for my English language message. I am unable to speak
Japanese. We do have a native Japanese speaker here, who could be
called upon if necessary.
The PostgreSQL team is planning to do a native Win32 port. Perhaps you
would like to help with the effort. In that way, your changes wi
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:34 PM
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
>
>
> OK, I think I am now caught up on the Win32/cygwin
> discussion, and would
> like to make some re
OK, I think I am now caught up on the Win32/cygwin discussion, and would
like to make some remarks.
First, are we doing enough to support the Win32 platform? I think the
answer is clearly "no". There are 3-5 groups/companies working on Win32
ports of PostgreSQL. We always said there would not
OK, I was wrong. '' can be sufficient. The DB just has to treat everything
between single quotes as data except for '' which is treated as a ' in the
data.
However raw control characters can still cause problems in the various
stages from the source to the DB.
Cheerio,
Link.
Lincoln Yeoh wro
At 09:58 PM 6/4/02 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Lincoln Yeoh writes:
>
> > But for the ANSI standard how does one stuff \r\n\t and other control
> > characters into the database?
> >
> > If there's no way other than actually sending the control characters then
> > that is a bad idea especially
This report was submitted as a Debian bug.
-Forwarded Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#149056: postgresql: should not try in a busy loop when allocating
resources
Date: 04 Jun 2002 23:06:35 +0200
Package: postgresql
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
When
Lincoln Yeoh writes:
> But for the ANSI standard how does one stuff \r\n\t and other control
> characters into the database?
>
> If there's no way other than actually sending the control characters then
> that is a bad idea especially from a security viewpoint.
Why??
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMA
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > From a PgSQL Project standpoint, pgaccess has always been included as a
> > way of increasing the overall distribution of the package as a valid GUI
> > interface ... all that has ever happened in the past is that when a new
> >
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> > gborg is another way to organize, and of course www.pgaccess.org is a
> > way too. It partly depends on how you see the future of pgaccess. If it
> > stays tightly coupled to pgsql, then perhaps it may as way stay
> > organized with pgsql.
>
> I see no reason why pgacc
The jdbc driver has a method to return the exported keys from a table,
we require essentially what the following select returns, but it is
slow, can anyone suggest ways to optimize it?
Regards,
Dave
SELECT
c.relname as primary,
c2.relname as foreign,
t.tgconstrname,
On 4 Jun 2002, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Java is another possibility, since it is already cross platform.
... with certain licensing issues ...
Just a remark
Andreas.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please
Jason Tishler wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:36:51AM -0400, mlw wrote:
> > Jason Tishler wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:33:57PM -0400, mlw wrote:
> > > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > > mlw wrote:
> > > > > > Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll
Jason Tishler wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:33:57PM -0400, mlw wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > mlw wrote:
> > > > Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll write
> > > > it for Windows.
> > > >
> > > > That being said, a SysV IPC interface for native Window
Java is another possibility, since it is already cross platform.
Dave
On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 01:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> > - creating a PostgreSQL + Cygwin modern GUI installer. All required .DEB
> > packages would be downloaded and installed from Debian mirrors, with
14 matches
Mail list logo
