Re: [HACKERS] Weird manual page

2002-07-29 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What's with this manual page? > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/gist.html > > GiST is, um, *very* poorly documented. Feel free to submit doc patches. > (I've just committed a few t

[HACKERS] DROP COLUMN round 4

2002-07-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Hi All, This is another cut of the DROP COLUMN patch. I have split the drop function into two parts - and now handle dependencies. Problems: 1. It cascade deletes objects, but it _always_ cascades, no matter what behaviour I specify. Also, it doesn't give me indications that it's cascade dele

Re: [HACKERS] Weird manual page

2002-07-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> > What's with this manual page? > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/gist.html > > GiST is, um, *very* poorly documented. Feel free to submit doc patches. > (I've just committed a few tidbits in xindex.sgml, but much more work > is needed.) Weell...first I'd have to learn

Re: [HACKERS] Weird manual page

2002-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What's with this manual page? > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/gist.html GiST is, um, *very* poorly documented. Feel free to submit doc patches. (I've just committed a few tidbits in xindex.sgml, but much more work is need

Re: [HACKERS] WAL file location

2002-07-29 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> > I've developed patches to be able to specify the location of the WAL > > directory, with the default location being where it is now. The patches > > define a new environment variable PGXLOG (a la PGDATA) and postmaster, > > postgres, initdb and pg_ctl have been taught to recognize a new comman

[HACKERS] Weird manual page

2002-07-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
What's with this manual page? http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/gist.html Seems like it's almost accidental - like a copied and pasted email. It doesn't look like it should be there? Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: stand-alone composite types

2002-07-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> 3. Modify CREATE FUNCTION to allow the implicit creation of a dependent > composite type, e.g.: > > CREATE [ OR REPLACE ] FUNCTION name ( [ argtype [, ...] ] ) > RETURNS [setof] { data_type | (column_name data_type [, ... ]) }... > > This would automatically create a stand-alone

Re: [HACKERS] WAL file location

2002-07-29 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> > I've developed patches to be able to specify the location of the WAL > > directory, with the default location being where it is now. The patches > > define a new environment variable PGXLOG (a la PGDATA) and postmaster, > > postgres, initdb and pg_ctl have been taught to recognize a new comman

[HACKERS] Proposal: stand-alone composite types

2002-07-29 Thread Joe Conway
We've discussed at least a couple of times before that it would be nice to be able to create stand-alone composite types. Tom mentioned that ideally this would be done as part of a refactoring of system tables so that attributes belonged to pg_type, instead of belonging to pg_class. But it wasn't

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > You seem to have done a nice job with the + and @ for 'maps' ... how about > > third on that states that the map file has a username:password pair in it? > > > > I do like how the pg_hba.conf has changed, just don't like the

[HACKERS] statement_timeout

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
In my original statement_timeout code, if a query string had multiple statements, I would time the statements individually. I have modified it so it now times the entire string collectively. Do people realize that if you pass a single string to the backend, it makes the string into a single tran

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > You seem to have done a nice job with the + and @ for 'maps' ... how about > third on that states that the map file has a username:password pair in it? > > I do like how the pg_hba.conf has changed, just don't like the lose of > functionality :( OK, but the only logic f

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Uh, we've *never* supported "two bruce users" ... > > > > > He was being tricky by having different passwords for the same user on > > > each database, so one use

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > First and foremost in my mind ... how do you have two users in the system > > > with seperate passwords? ... > > > since as soon as there are two 'bruce' users, only one can have

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > First and foremost in my mind ... how do you have two users in the system > > with seperate passwords? ... > > since as soon as there are two 'bruce' users, only one can have a password > > Uh, we've *never

Re: [HACKERS] WAL file location

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I've developed patches to be able to specify the location of the WAL > > directory, with the default location being where it is now. The patches > > define a new environment variable PGXLOG (a la PGDATA) and postmaster, > > postgres

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Uh, we've *never* supported "two bruce users" ... > > > He was being tricky by having different passwords for the same user on > > each database, so one user couldn't get into the other database, even > > though

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Uh, we've *never* supported "two bruce users" ... > > > He was being tricky by having different passwords for the same user on > > each database, so one user couldn't get into the other database, even > > though

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > First and foremost in my mind ... how do you have two users in the system > > with seperate passwords? ... > > since as soon as there are two 'bruce' users, only one can have a password > > Uh, we've *never* supported "two bruc

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Uh, we've *never* supported "two bruce users" ... > He was being tricky by having different passwords for the same user on > each database, so one user couldn't get into the other database, even > though it was the same name. But the

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > First and foremost in my mind ... how do you have two users in the system > > with seperate passwords? ... > > since as soon as there are two 'bruce' users, only one can have a password > > Uh, we've *never* supported "two bruc

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > First and foremost in my mind ... how do you have two users in the system > with seperate passwords? ... > since as soon as there are two 'bruce' users, only one can have a password Uh, we've *never* supported "two bruce users" ... users have alwa

Re: [HACKERS] WAL file location

2002-07-29 Thread Curt Sampson
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > More generally, I do not like depending on postmaster environment > variables --- our experience with environment variables for database > locations has been uniformly bad > The existing secondary-location mechanism is horrible. Please do not > emulate

Re: [HACKERS] WAL file location

2002-07-29 Thread Curt Sampson
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > I've developed patches to be able to specify the location of the WAL > directory, with the default location being where it is now. The patches > define a new environment variable PGXLOG (a la PGDATA) and postmaster, > postgres, initdb and pg_ctl have

Re: [HACKERS] WAL file location

2002-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've developed patches to be able to specify the location of the WAL > directory, with the default location being where it is now. The patches > define a new environment variable PGXLOG (a la PGDATA) and postmaster, > postgres, initdb and pg_ctl have b

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Actually, it is replaced by encrypted pg_shadow by default in 7.3, and > > the new USER (users or groups) column in pg_hba.conf that will be in 7.3 > > that can restrict based on user/group. This replaces the use of the >

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Actually, it is replaced by encrypted pg_shadow by default in 7.3, and > the new USER (users or groups) column in pg_hba.conf that will be in 7.3 > that can restrict based on user/group. This replaces the use of the > secondary file for just usernames.

Re: [HACKERS] Question about LWLockAcquire's use of semaphores instead

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Robert E. Bruccoleri wrote: > Dear Tom, > Thank you for the explanation. I did not understand what was > going on in lwlock.c. Yes, as Tom said, using the pre-7.2 code on SMP machines, if one backend had a spinlock, the other backend would TAS loop trying to get the lock until its timeslice

Re: [HACKERS] CVS server munted

2002-07-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
am looking at it now ... trying to figure out where we're using >30gig of space righ tnow :( On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Hi guys, > > When I try to do a cvs up I get this: > can't create temporary directory /var/tmp/cvs-serv39998 > No space left on device > > And on th

[HACKERS] disk space problem ...

2002-07-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
d'oh, always helps go rotate those damn logs ... auto-rotation now in place, shouldn't happen again for a good long time (had >6gig taken up in very very big log files *sigh*) ... ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > > > Something to maybe add to the TODO list, if someone has the > > > time/inclination to work on it ... > > > > > > The problem with the current auth system, as I see it, is that you can't >

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > Something to maybe add to the TODO list, if someone has the > > time/inclination to work on it ... > > > > The problem with the current auth system, as I see it, is that you can't > > easily have seperate user lists and p

[HACKERS] CVS server problem

2002-07-29 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
Can anyone fix this? $ cvs up can't create temporary directory /tmp/cvs-serv40296 No space left on device -- Tatsuo Ishii ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

[HACKERS] ODBC Drivers Broken

2002-07-29 Thread Rod Taylor
The current ODBC drivers on the website don't appear to work with recent development. I'm able to login, but immediately after it throws the error 'Blank' with a large negative number above (-2^16 or so). I don't have Visual C, so would it be possible for someone to build a new (working) driver

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Something to maybe add to the TODO list, if someone has the > time/inclination to work on it ... > > The problem with the current auth system, as I see it, is that you can't > easily have seperate user lists and passwords per database ... its shared > across the syste

Re: [HACKERS] Password sub-process ...

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 13:55:58 -0300, > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > As an example ... at the University I work at, we've started to use PgSQL > > for more and more of our internal stuff, and/or let the students start to > > use it for their p

Re: [HACKERS] solaris 9?

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
We are in the process of refactoring how the port-specific files are used in PostgreSQL. Please grab a newer CVS and give it a try. Thanks. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > With pg 7.2 I had no problems, but getting the dev

[HACKERS] CVS broken

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Because of a runaway process on postgresql.org, CVS is working intermittently, if at all. I have contacted Marc. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue

[HACKERS] CVS server munted

2002-07-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Hi guys, When I try to do a cvs up I get this: can't create temporary directory /var/tmp/cvs-serv39998 No space left on device And on the 15min SGML docs site there's this: Changes in this build: can't create temporary directory /var/tmp/cvs-serv39998 No space left on device Chris ---

[HACKERS] WAL file location

2002-07-29 Thread Thomas Lockhart
I've developed patches to be able to specify the location of the WAL directory, with the default location being where it is now. The patches define a new environment variable PGXLOG (a la PGDATA) and postmaster, postgres, initdb and pg_ctl have been taught to recognize a new command line switch "-

Re: [HACKERS] No bison and NAMEDATALEN > 31: initdb failure?

2002-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
Ian Barwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - Does src/include/postgres_ext.h count as a parser definition file? No, it doesn't. Your experience sounds like you may have neglected to do a full rebuild after altering NAMEDATALEN. (By default, we don't compute object-file dependencies, so it's up t

Re: [HACKERS] That CREATE OPERATOR CLASS patch

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Looks like Tom got this patch in. Thanks. --- Bill Studenmund wrote: > On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Good question. I see the thread at: > > > > >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=P

Re: [HACKERS] outer join help...

2002-07-29 Thread Yuva Chandolu
The query without alias is working fine. Thanks for the performance hint, we were actually using this query on very big tables and definitely we would have slipped into performance problems with aliases. Now we are safe. Thanks a lot Marc. -Yuva Sr. Java Developer www.ebates.com -Original M

Re: [HACKERS] That CREATE OPERATOR CLASS patch

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Looks like Tom got this in. Thanks. --- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > If Bruce is thinking of applying outstanding patches - whatever happened > with Bill Studenmund's CREATE OPERATOR CLASS patch? > > Chris > > > ---

[HACKERS] No bison and NAMEDATALEN > 31: initdb failure?

2002-07-29 Thread Ian Barwick
I had occasion (and a perfectly good reason) to install 7.1.3 on a fresh server [1]. Installation succeeded as normal, data failed to load because some relation names go beyond 31 characters. , alter NAMEDATALEN, recompile. initdb fails immediately after the message "creating template1 database

Re: [HACKERS] outer join help...

2002-07-29 Thread Marc Lavergne
Looks fine, you may want to rephrase it as: select yt1_name, yt1_descr, yt2_name, yt2_descr, yt3_name, yt3_descr from yuva_test1 left outer join yuva_test2 on yt1_id = yt2_id left outer join yuva_test3 on yt1_id = yt3_id to make it more legible. The alias is overkill in this ca

Re: [HACKERS] TPC-* Benchmarks

2002-07-29 Thread Justin Clift
Hi Paul, You might want to take at look at the Open Source Database Benchmark project: http://www.sf.net/projects/osdb This is an implementation (by Andy Riebs from Compaq) of the AS3AP database benchmark, and works with PostgreSQL, MySQL, and one other database too from memory. You're probabl

Re: [HACKERS] outer join help...

2002-07-29 Thread Yuva Chandolu
Hi, I tried yuva_test1 left outer join yuva_test2 and yuva_test1 left outer join yuva_test3 in the same query in Oracle. I tried the following query in postgres and it worked... select yt1_name, yt1_descr, yt2_name, yt2_descr, yt3_name, yt3_descr from (yuva_test1 left outer join yuva_test2 on yt

[HACKERS] TPC-* Benchmarks

2002-07-29 Thread Paul Ramsey
Have any organizations run TPC benchmarks against PostgreSQL other than the old and much maligned GreatBridge benchmark? It is unfortunate that there are not any moderately standard benchmarks available regarding PostgreSQL. I do not need to say "PgSQL is better than X", but it would be nice to a

[HACKERS] (still) unintegrated stuff in CVS

2002-07-29 Thread Neil Conway
The problems noticed by Peter E several weeks ago have not yet been resolved: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=Pine.LNX.4.44.0207082049460.1247-10%40localhost.localdomain (namely, that libpqxx and the new SSL code have not been fully integrated into the tree) In

[HACKERS] Postgres Lock Up Fun

2002-07-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Hi, I've just managed to recover from a fun Postgres lock up experience! Basically Postgres seemed to have hung, with a stack of idle postmaster processes. There was an idle VACUUM process and an idle CHECKPOINT process running as well. I finally managed to get it restarted (after a reboot), t

Re: [HACKERS] question on backends

2002-07-29 Thread Hannu Krosing
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 20:50, Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro wrote: > libpq > PQsetdb( > - Original Message - > From: "Hannu Krosing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:40 PM > Subject: Re:

Re: [HACKERS] question on backends

2002-07-29 Thread Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
libpq PQsetdb( - Original Message - From: "Hannu Krosing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] question on backends > On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 20:21, Luis Alberto A

Re: [HACKERS] question on backends

2002-07-29 Thread Hannu Krosing
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 20:21, Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro wrote: > if i put debug_level=1 i get for one connect and several inserts on backend > die after each insert What client do you use ? -- Hannu ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't '

Re: [HACKERS] question on backends

2002-07-29 Thread Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
if i put debug_level=1 i get for one connect and several inserts on backend die after each insert - Original Message - From: "Hannu Krosing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 8:42 PM Subject: Re: [HA

Re: [HACKERS] Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

2002-07-29 Thread Hannu Krosing
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 19:01, Curt Sampson wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Curt Sampson wrote: > > > I'm still waiting to find out just what advantage table inheritance > > > offers. I've asked a couple of times here, and nobody has even started > > > to come up with anyth

Re: [HACKERS] question on backends

2002-07-29 Thread Hannu Krosing
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 11:32, Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro wrote: > Hi all > As I understand every time there is a request to postgres a new backend > is made, and when the request is finished, even if the connection is > already active the backend dies. I think you have misunderstood it. A new back

Re: [HACKERS] Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

2002-07-29 Thread Curt Sampson
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Curt Sampson wrote: > > I'm still waiting to find out just what advantage table inheritance > > offers. I've asked a couple of times here, and nobody has even started > > to come up with anything. > > We inherited inheritance from Berkeley. I doubt we

Re: [HACKERS] Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

2002-07-29 Thread Mike Mascari
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Curt Sampson wrote: > > I'm still waiting to find out just what advantage table inheritance > > offers. I've asked a couple of times here, and nobody has even started > > to come up with anything. > > We inherited inheritance from Berkeley. I doubt we would have added i

Re: [HACKERS] Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

2002-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Curt Sampson wrote: > I'm still waiting to find out just what advantage table inheritance > offers. I've asked a couple of times here, and nobody has even started > to come up with anything. We inherited inheritance from Berkeley. I doubt we would have added it ourselves. It causes too much com

Re: [HACKERS] question on backends

2002-07-29 Thread Neil Conway
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 11:28:54PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > libpq has a function pconnect as opposed to connect that will do it. libpq has neither function, AFAIK. As for persistent backends, it's on the TODO list, but I'm not aware that anyone has put any work into implementing i

Re: [HACKERS] Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

2002-07-29 Thread Curt Sampson
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: > I would like to add one other thought. There are many web site > designers that get thrust into being a web site programmer. Without > an understanding of database design and a novice programmers (?) view > of the process the benefits of letting

Re: [HACKERS] question on backends

2002-07-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
libpq has a function pconnect as opposed to connect that will do it.  PHP and most other interfaces will let you use persistent connections.   Chris - Original Message - From: Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro To: Christopher Kings-Lynne ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday,

Re: [HACKERS] Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

2002-07-29 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Chris Humphries wrote: > well that and people tend to drift towards an easy answer, > like php... amazing how that combo is so popular... hrrmm... Well people seem to get so ... about php that I didn't want to touch that topic. Rod -- "Open Source Software - Sometimes

Re: [HACKERS] GPL License

2002-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> From: Rod Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Given the GPL isn't wanted in the contrib directory, it may >> be wise to take care of src/interfaces/odbc/license.txt > Take care of it how? It can't be just removed as everything under > src/interfaces/o

Re: [HACKERS] GPL License

2002-07-29 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Rod Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 29 July 2002 14:44 > To: Dave Page > Cc: PostgreSQL-development > Subject: RE: [HACKERS] GPL License > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Rod Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 29 July 20

Re: [HACKERS] Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

2002-07-29 Thread Chris Humphries
well that and people tend to drift towards an easy answer, like php... amazing how that combo is so popular... hrrmm... Roderick A. Anderson writes: > On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [snip] > > > e) Inertia. MySQL got more popular way back when; the reasons may no longer

Re: [HACKERS] GPL License

2002-07-29 Thread Rod Taylor
> > -Original Message- > > From: Rod Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 July 2002 14:39 > > To: PostgreSQL-development > > Subject: [HACKERS] GPL License > > > > > > Given the GPL isn't wanted in the contrib directory, it may > > be wise to take care of src/interfaces/odbc/

Re: [HACKERS] GPL License

2002-07-29 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Rod Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 29 July 2002 14:39 > To: PostgreSQL-development > Subject: [HACKERS] GPL License > > > Given the GPL isn't wanted in the contrib directory, it may > be wise to take care of src/interfaces/odbc/license.txt Tak

Re: [HACKERS] Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

2002-07-29 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] > e) Inertia. MySQL got more popular way back when; the reasons may no longer > apply, but nobody is going to move to PostgreSQL without _compelling_ reason, > and you'll have to show something _really compelling_. I would like to add one o

[HACKERS] GPL License

2002-07-29 Thread Rod Taylor
Given the GPL isn't wanted in the contrib directory, it may be wise to take care of src/interfaces/odbc/license.txt ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] JDBC does not compile

2002-07-29 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> Make sure you have a clean copy of the source, Barry has done an > extensive re-organization to remove the duplicate code between jdbc1, > and jdbc2, to prepare for jdbc3. > > It compiles clean on my machine using jdk1.3.1 It turns out that my class path did bad thing. After unset the class p

Re: [HACKERS] Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

2002-07-29 Thread cbbrowne
> > Just a long standing curiosity? > > For most web sites MySQL seems to work fine, but overall PostgreSQL offers > more capabilites so why build upon a limited base such as MySQL? > > Does anyone here have any idea as to why so many people select MySQL when > both systems are open sourced?

[HACKERS] PL/PGSQL q?

2002-07-29 Thread Vitaliy N. Kravchenko
1234567890 Hi! I write function on plpgsql and have some troubles: I have table "owe" : uid int4, date int4, cost float4; I want to select into "owe_old" : DECLARE owe_old float4; cur_date := date_part(''year'', now()) || ''-'' || date_part(''month'', now()) || ''-01''; we have cur_dat

[HACKERS] Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

2002-07-29 Thread Matthew Tedder
Just a long standing curiosity? For most web sites MySQL seems to work fine, but overall PostgreSQL offers more capabilites so why build upon a limited base such as MySQL? Does anyone here have any idea as to why so many people select MySQL when both systems are open sourced? Matthew -

Re: [HACKERS] question on backends

2002-07-29 Thread Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
How? - Original Message - From: Christopher Kings-Lynne To: Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] question on backends Just use persistent connections.   Chris - Original Mes

Re: [HACKERS] question on backends

2002-07-29 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Just use persistent connections.   Chris - Original Message - From: Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 5:32 PM Subject: [HACKERS] question on backends Hi all As I understand every time there is a request to pos

Re: [HACKERS] Virus Emails

2002-07-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On 28 Jul 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > > On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 20:10, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > > > God, I go through 200+ of those almost daily as moderator ... imagine if > > > we had the lists open? :) > > I picked up a copy of McAfee's v

Re: [HACKERS] Virus Emails

2002-07-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > God, I go through 200+ of those almost daily as moderator ... imagine if > > we had the lists open? :) > > > > How do you prevent virus emails from coming in that look like they are > from the intended person? Does the f

Re: [HACKERS] Question about LWLockAcquire's use of semaphores instead of spinlocks

2002-07-29 Thread Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
- Original Message - From: "Robert E. Bruccoleri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 2:48 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Question about LWLockAcquire's use of sem

Re: [HACKERS] JDBC does not compile

2002-07-29 Thread Dave Cramer
Make sure you have a clean copy of the source, Barry has done an extensive re-organization to remove the duplicate code between jdbc1, and jdbc2, to prepare for jdbc3. It compiles clean on my machine using jdk1.3.1 Dave On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 22:12, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > It seems JDBC in current

[HACKERS] question on backends

2002-07-29 Thread Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
Hi all As I understand every time there is a request to postgres a new backend is made, and when the request is finished, even if the connection is already active the backend dies. I wonder if is there any parameter that allow backends to remain beyond a transaction. Creating a new backend e