Re: Antw: Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql and multithreading

2002-10-20 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On 18 Oct 2002 at 18:10, Ulrich Neumann wrote: > > > I'm still VERY interested in giving those changes back to the > > community, but i think that my changes are still not wanted. Okay, can you submit such changes in pieces / steps? For instance,

[HACKERS] CVS - projects

2002-10-20 Thread Keith Gray
Hello all, Newbie time... where do I browse for CVS membership? What tools are hackers using for IDE? Any other advice for a new interest in MIN() MAX() and indexes? Keith Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched

Re: [HACKERS] reminder for those working on docs

2002-10-20 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I've gone through this, and found only a couple of things that seemed >> worth migrating into the 7.3 docs. Perhaps I just have a low tolerance >> for silliness tonight, but it seemed like the average quality of the >> comments was a l

[HACKERS] bison 1.75 installed ...

2002-10-20 Thread Marc G. Fournier
let me know if there are any problems with it ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] reminder for those working on docs

2002-10-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Since 7.3 is getting real close and docs are going to be going through > > their final once-overs. Please remember to have a look at the DocNote > > comments that have been submitted. Once 7.3 is released the current > > notes will

[HACKERS] I see the end!

2002-10-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, I can now see the 7.3 final release. I have Philip's patch, which I will apply sometime tomorrow, with the hope it gets some big-endian testing. If someone can test that, please do. We can't make Tom do everything. :-) Michael, please update ecpg. Marc, please update bison. Other CVS bu

Re: [HACKERS] reminder for those working on docs

2002-10-20 Thread Tom Lane
Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since 7.3 is getting real close and docs are going to be going through > their final once-overs. Please remember to have a look at the DocNote > comments that have been submitted. Once 7.3 is released the current > notes will be gone. > http://w

Re: [HACKERS] timestamp cast to abstime problem

2002-10-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
I figured this all out; turns out they were related. I had set my timezone in the postmaster to Poland long ago and forgot, and that is why both the abstime and show timezone produced strange results. Sorry. --- Bruce Mom

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

2002-10-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Philip Warner wrote: > At 09:18 PM 20/10/2002 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. > > I'm happy to apply it when necessary; but I wouldn't do it until we've from > some someone with a big-endian machine... Well, I think Tom was going to try it on his H

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

2002-10-20 Thread Philip Warner
At 09:18 PM 20/10/2002 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. I'm happy to apply it when necessary; but I wouldn't do it until we've from some someone with a big-endian machine... Philip Wa

[HACKERS] timestamp cast to abstime problem

2002-10-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Does anyone know why this returns 0 and not 3600? test=> select '1970-01-01 01:00:00'::timestamp::abstime::int4; int4 -- 0 (1 row) My time(2) manual page says: The time() function returns the value of time in seconds since 0 hou

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

2002-10-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --- Philip Warner wrote: > > I have put the

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Buffers and MacOS X

2002-10-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We are installing postgres on a MacOS X Server... > > On our Linux box, we had to muddle with some parameters to be able to > > increase the shared memory and buffers in postgres. > > Does anyone know how to do this in OS X? Or is it

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Problem granting usage on language c

2002-10-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 10:50:59 -0500, Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I try to grant usage on language c in 7.3b1 I get an error message > saying I can't because the language isn't trusted. Is this different in b2? > I can see using whether or not a language is trusted to set