[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Kevin Brown wrote:
> > Simply saying "MySQL has better marketing" isn't enough. It's too
> > simple an answer and obscures some issues that should probably be
> > addressed.
>
> I think it /is/ a significant factor, the point being that the MySQL company
> has been qui
Jinqiang Han wrote:
> it seems the crosstab function you write in contrib/tablefunc can't work.
> it saids that A column definition list is required for functions returning RECORD.
> How can i make it work?
>From contrib/tablefunc/README.tablefunc:
Outputs
Returns setof record, which must def
hello, Joe Conway.
it seems the crosstab function you write in contrib/tablefunc can't work.
it saids that A column definition list is required for functions returning RECORD.
How can i make it work?
thank you very much
best regard,
Jinqiang Han
---(end of broadcas
Darren Johnson wrote:
> The group communication system doesn't just run on one system. For
> postgres-r using spread
The reason why group communication software is used is simply because
this software is designed with two goals in mind:
1) optimize bandwidth usage
2) make many-to-many communic
But it's something they should of already had to do. We're just paying
late for old sins. ;)
Greg
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 23:34, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > OK, so what do we do with 7.3.1. Increment major or minor?
> >
> > Major
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:49:57PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I iterate over the elements of the parent page in a for loop, and the
> upper bound is rarely reached because the item is found. However
> sometimes the item isn't found, and PageGetItem fails its assertion
> because the item isn't
Hello hackers,
I wonder what the PageGetMaxOffsetNumber macro is supposed to do (in a
btree index page)?
The scenario is the following: I need to get the pointer to a btree
page (leaf or internal) in its parent page, to call _bt_itemdel on it.
The only thing I can think of is to use its parent l
> You can't sell into the "ISP appliance market" until there's something as
> ubiquitous as "PHPMyAdmin" for PostgreSQL. And note that the "ISP
appliance
> market" only cares about this in a very indirect way. They don't actually
use
> the database; their /customers/ do. And their customers are
Jonathan,
Many thanks for clarifying the situation some more. With token passing, I
have the following concerns;
1) What happends if a server holding the token should die whilst it is in
posession of the token.
2) If I have n servers, and the time to pass the token between each server
is x milli
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:21:07AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> However, an app linked against libpq++ would also be linked against
> libpq, and so the incompatibility will be flagged by the linker anyway.
> I can see no need to bump libpq++'s own number.
Plus, of course, libpq++ being a C++ librar
Kevin Brown wrote:
> Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
> > I do NOT like hearing about MySQL in this (these) list(s).
> >
> > PostgreSQL is not in the same category with MySQL. MySQL is for
> > *dummies*, not database admins. I do not even call it a database. I
> > have never forgotten my data loss 2,5 years
Jonathan,
How do the group communication daemons on system A and B agree that T2 is
after T1?,
As I understand it the operation is performed locally before being passed on
to the group for replication, when T2 arrives at system B, system B has no
knowlege of T1 and so can perform T2 sucessfully.
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> Do I need to increment the other interfaces that
>> _use_ libpq, like ecpg?
> If and only if the libpq API is part of their documented API. For ecpg I
> think this is not the case, but for libpq++ it would seem to be the case
Hannu Krosing writes:
> Could you also post it somewhere as a plain SQL script for 7.3 ?
It depends on SQL features not present in 7.3. But you can download it
from the CVS web interface and make the adjustments yourself if you want
to use it.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Do I need to increment the other interfaces that
> _use_ libpq, like ecpg?
If and only if the libpq API is part of their documented API. For ecpg I
think this is not the case, but for libpq++ it would seem to be the case.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David,
This can be resolved by requiring that for any transaction to succeed the
entrypoint database must receive acknowlegements from n/2 + 0.5 (rounded up
to the nearest integer) databases where n is the total number in the
replicant set. The following cases are shown as an example;
Total Numbe
Another concern I have with multi-master systems is what happens if the
network splits in 2 so that 2 master systems are taking commits for 2
separate sets of clients. It seems to me that to re-sync the 2 databases
upon the network healing would be a very complex task or impossible task.
On Su
Many thanks for the explanation. Could you explain to me where the order or
the writeset for the following scenario;
If a tranasction takes 50ms to reach one database from another, for a
specific data element (called X), the following timeline occurs
at 0ms, T1(X) is written to system A.
at 10ms,
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, I have updated the libpq major number in 7.3.X, and updated major
> and minor in HEAD. Do I need to increment the other interfaces that
> _use_ libpq, like ecpg? I think so.
You'll only need to increment the major number of those other
interfaces that are no longer b
19 matches
Mail list logo
