-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 19 December 2002 16:09, you wrote:
Hello,
Do you have other databases that work with UNICODE? You can check the
encoding of all your databases with 'psql -l'. You can check if you can
create any unicode databases with 'createdb -E
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I agree it should be bumped up, but the issue is whether to do that
in a minor release. It will increase shared memory by 36k. Is that
safe in a beta? Tom, Mr. FSM, can you comment?
It seems a reasonably safe change, but I
Hi all
I have install Postgresql 7.3 with user name EDU.then I enter the psql to
change the password for EDU using "alter user EDU with password '''it
returns " user EDU do not exist".I check the system table pg_user, and the
user 'EDU' actually exists.But if I take the following
You
need to go:
ALTER
USER "EDU" WITH PASSWORD '';
Since
you have used an uppercase name, you will always need to double quote
it.
Chris
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
postgresqlSent: Friday, 20 December 2002 10:01
Small fix in documentation and some examples of usage.
Please, apply to 7.3 and current CVS
Regards,
Oleg
_
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow
Uh, we are not sure if we have released 7.3.1 yet. :-0
There are some doc change that folks wanted, so we aren't announcing it
yet.
---
Tommi Maekitalo wrote:
Hi,
the link to latest version points to the currently
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Philip Warner wrote:
At 10:49 PM 18/12/2002 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I don't think we can bump that up in a minor.
Why not? It's a relatively serious problem with the default config.
Should we?
Yes.
I concur. The problems of a too-low fsm setting are
scott.marlowe wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Philip Warner wrote:
At 10:49 PM 18/12/2002 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I don't think we can bump that up in a minor.
Why not? It's a relatively serious problem with the default config.
Should we?
Yes.
I concur. The problems of
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I agree it should be bumped up, but the issue is whether to do that
in a minor release. It will increase shared memory by 36k. Is that
safe in a beta? Tom, Mr. FSM, can you comment?
It seems a reasonably safe change, but I
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 12:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
OK, what additional things need to be done for 7.3.1? As far as I know,
we have done everything.
Do we want to coordinate with Lamar or Oliver about having packages
ready to coincide with the release announcement?
Robert Treat
Kevin Brown wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I agree it should be bumped up, but the issue is whether to do that
in a minor release. It will increase shared memory by 36k. Is that
safe in a beta? Tom, Mr. FSM, can you comment?
It seems a
Joe Conway writes:
I'm wondering whether it would be a good thing or a bad thing to have
unrecognized settings found in postgresql.conf be registered as user defined
settings?
Certainly bad, since all error checking would go away. This is one of the
main reasons why registering settings at
Bruce Momjian writes:
Note: If you are upgrading an existing system and are going to
install the new files over the old ones, then you should have
backed up your data and shut down the old server by now, as
explained in the Section called If You Are
Tom Lane writes:
If someone's willing to do the work of regenerating the doc tarballs,
I think it would be a real good idea to update them for minor releases.
They are being updated, they have been for quite a while, and there's no
one volunteering because it's done rather automatically. (The
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 18:40, Robert Treat wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 12:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
OK, what additional things need to be done for 7.3.1? As far as I know,
we have done everything.
Do we want to coordinate with Lamar or Oliver about having packages
ready to coincide
15 matches
Mail list logo
