> these changes for 7.4 and also release a binary version in the mean time.
> I have a copy of a 7.2 psql binary for linux that that has some of the
> 7.3 psql improvments in it, sometimes it comes in very handy. I'd be
> interested in helping out with this, though Christopher would probably
> star
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Mike Mascari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Does Oracle's PL/SQL have a concept of record variables? If so, what
> >> do they do in this situation?
>
> > In Oracle 8, a row of NULLs:
>
> > 1 CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fo
The change was made because a BSD/OS developer said flockfile was POSIX,
and pointed to something that suggested NetBSD supports it. I will back
out the change. We really don't need fseeko/ftello to be thread safe
anyway.
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried creating a rule like:
> create rule "_RETURN" as on select to asfd do instead select * from blah;
> And it worked.
> But it doesn't appear in pg_rules.
That's by design. pg_rules suppresses view rules. You'll find asfd in
pg_views, in
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 03:34:22 -0500, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> On Friday 10 January 2003 23:50, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> > That was the aspect I feared ... almost an argument in itself for why
>> > psql should be in gborg as a seperate project ;)
>>
>>
I tried creating a rule like:
create rule "_RETURN" as on select to asfd do instead select * from blah;
And it worked.
But it doesn't appear in pg_rules.
I created this one:
create rule myrule as on insert to asfd do instead nothing;
And it does appear:
test=# select * from pg_rules ;
schem
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday 10 January 2003 23:50, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > That was the aspect I feared ... almost an argument in itself for why psql
> > should be in gborg as a seperate project ;)
>
> You've got to be kidding. The main command-line interface NEEDS to b
