Re: [HACKERS] set constraints docs page

2003-08-27 Thread Kevin Brown
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Kevin Brown wrote: > > The two approaches aren't necessarily mutually exclusive (though SQL99 > > compliance on constraint names would obviously make it unnecessary to > > specify a tablename along with a constraint name), so I see little > > problem here. But the current ar

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Replication Ideas

2003-08-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
[ Moved to hackers.] Jan Wieck wrote: > I am currently hacking around with some C+PL/TclU+Spread constructs that > might form a rude kind of prototype creature. > > My changes to the Postgres-R concept are that there will be as many > replicating slave processes as there are in summary masters

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Replication Ideas

2003-08-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If you can detect if outside transactions conflict with your > > transaction, you should be able to determine if the outside transactions > > conflict with each other. > > Uh ... not necessarily. That amounts to assuming that every x

Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE vs WARNING

2003-08-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Christopher Kings-Lynne writes: > > > Surely a WARNING is a problem that you should probably fix? > > How are "should" and "probably" defined? > > > Or at least pay attention to. > > If it were in fact the characteristic of a NOTICE that you need not pay > attention to

Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE vs WARNING

2003-08-27 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> If it were in fact the characteristic of a NOTICE that you need not pay > attention to them, why do we have them? I have often wondered that myself. > > My thought is that you could turn off NOTICES and not worry. > > Well, there are plenty of NOTICE instances that carry a definite need to > wo

Re: [HACKERS] MHonArc configuration for spam protection

2003-08-27 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Done ... am regenerating all the archives right now: # To: jm ( at ) poure ( dot ) com On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Christoph Dalitz wrote: > Hello Marc, > > On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:30:52 -0300 (ADT) > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > as I've asked in the past, if you know of a > >

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Replication Ideas

2003-08-27 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you can detect if outside transactions conflict with your > transaction, you should be able to determine if the outside transactions > conflict with each other. Uh ... not necessarily. That amounts to assuming that every xact has complete knowledge o