but what about default style ?
first time when i saw DateStyle i thought that i can use it like C/C++
function strftime. I would be not bad idea to have custom data style :)
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Create table with type TIMESTAMP(0)
Chris
ivan wrote:
how
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 09:25:14AM +0100, ivan wrote:
but what about default style ?
first time when i saw DateStyle i thought that i can use it like C/C++
function strftime. I would be not bad idea to have custom data style :)
Use to_char() function to put it in any format you want.
Kurt
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:49:23PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
I think one way of attacking the problem would be using the existing
nbtree by allowing it to store the five btrees.
Why not write it using the GiST interface - that is after all the entire
point of GiST...
Well, the
Can you explain what you mean by this?
Dave
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 20:21, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Will we need to address this TODO item:
. Add capability to create and call PROCEDURES
before proceding to do PL/Java? It would add to the usefulness greatly,
I should think. I'm not sure how
ok, bat each time where i want to do select .. a nie tu use to_char,
but it should be in function timestamp_out to convert time to string
it would be easer and faster.
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 09:25:14AM +0100, ivan wrote:
but what about default style
Hello,
I've tried asking this question elsewhere and have not received a
satisfactory response.
I want to restrict users of my packaged database from directly accessing
the data or reading the schema. I would provide access to the read-only
data through functions (which works well in PG). I
Can I chip in? I've had a look in the past at the way various databases
perform this. Most just go and read the data, though Informix does seem
to keep a permanent record of the number of rows in a table...which
probably adds overhead you don't really want.
Select count(*) could be evaluated
Hello,
Has anybody had such problem - I tested Mammoth PostgreSQL for Windows and I
did not like that it completely killed my cygwin, did not allow console
commands to the database, etc., and then I uninstalled it.
Since then the cygwin refused to operate properly.
From Command Prompt I was
Barry,
Ok, so if we drop this limitation then we leave it up to the architect
to manage the caching problem themselves.
The class loader issue is interesting, this would mean that each object
static or otherwise would not be able to overwrite others data.
--dc--
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 19:34,
in preproc.y:2021:
opt_revoke_grant_option: GRANT OPTION FOR
$$ = make_str(with grant option);
should be:
$$ = make_str(grant option for);
I get the lastest CVS version.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your
Ollie Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
comp.databases.postgresql.hackers:
[sNip]
which is different from previous versions and different to MySQL and SQL
Server. Is this a bug, or can you turn this behaviour off? It's breaking
a lot of our applications!
Could you clarify which
I try to execute Postgres on Linux. It is blocked
in execution. When I traced through, I found out that
it is blocked on invoking a malloc( ). Any help? Thank you
in advance.
Shuqing
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive
Hi Vishal,
usage of floating poing arithmetic is a taboo in financial calculations.
This what the decimal type has been created for. Never ever use float.
Ciao, Toni
Sai Hertz And Control Systems wrote:
Dear all ,
I would like to share my concerns about the IEEE 754 specification and
Dave Cramer said:
Can you explain what you mean by this?
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 20:21, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Will we need to address this TODO item:
. Add capability to create and call PROCEDURES
before proceding to do PL/Java? It would add to the usefulness
greatly, I should think. I'm
Michael Gill said:
Hello,
I've tried asking this question elsewhere and have not received a
satisfactory response.
I want to restrict users of my packaged database from directly
accessing the data or reading the schema. I would provide access to
the read-only data through functions
D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
When I started with PostgreSQL and MySQL, MySQL was far easier
to use
I started with MySQL and it WAS easier to use. It was easier because
the manual essentially reads:
-- we didn't implement anything complicated that's why
-- we are fast.
The only SQL
Hi,
I was wondering if I have a function that returns a record datatype, and I call it using the as keyword to specify the table structure, can I return a different structure than the one specified?
Say I call select * from xy ('abc', 'def') as (samplea char, sampleb char) for a function of
17 matches
Mail list logo
