With the current definitions of the "special" snapshot values:
#define SnapshotNow ((Snapshot) 0x0)
#define SnapshotSelf ((Snapshot) 0x1)
#define SnapshotAny ((Snapshot) 0x2)
#define SnapshotToast((Snapshot) 0x3)
it is not possible
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 13:43, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > collect2: ld returned 254 exit status
>
> That's a fairly unhelpful error message, isn't it?
>
> I'm thinking that this may be due to having added the timezone
> library to the backend link, but I really don
Are there any plans to support indexed views, or cross-table indexes,
or any form of "materialized views" in postgresql? How complex would
the implementation be? Indexed views are sometimes the best way to
improve the performance of complex queries.
-Tiago
---(end of broad
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> collect2: ld returned 254 exit status
That's a fairly unhelpful error message, isn't it?
I'm thinking that this may be due to having added the timezone
library to the backend link, but I really don't see just how.
Afraid you're on your own to identify the
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
[ PGP not available, raw data follows ]
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> | Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |>I don't know if APR provide a spin lock mechanism,
> |
> |
> | You don't even know that, but you're confident
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> > I'd love to see a comment added to the linux start-script included in
> > contrib that referenced update-rc.d. It's useful to note because
> > Debian has different runlevels from Red Hat, and update-rc.d will
> > intellig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Stark wrote:
> Well there's always \dtS and \dvS I don't see why typing \dfS is any harder.
>
> It would be nice for this to be more visible in the documentation and the \?
> output though. I've only just found it after months of pulling hair
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
I want to clarify this.
The point of the core is they won't do it because
they have things more important to do, or, the feature
will never be part of the postgresql even if someone
else contribute it.
Maybe i am not capable of contribute it but i will
try if the feat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane wrote:
| Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|>|> ERROR: invalid string enlargement request size 1476395004
|>|> DEBUG: AbortCurrentTransaction
|>|> WARNING: AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
|>|> ERROR: could not send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shahbaz Javeed wrote:
| I've always considered a table definition to be an unordered hash so
| the concept of putting something in the "middle of a table" from that
| view doesn't seem to have a point.
|
| Just my $0.02
I already wrote my motivation, an
10 matches
Mail list logo
