Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
I'm interested if anyone is using tablespaces? Do we have any actual
reports of people actually using them, to advantage, in the field??
Maybe the next postgresql.org survey could be on tablespace usage?
Chris
I have seen that tablespaces are widely used and
I'm interested if anyone is using tablespaces? Do we have any actual
reports of people actually using them, to advantage, in the field??
Maybe the next postgresql.org survey could be on tablespace usage?
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9:
Just got word back that they have reached their 'limit' on # of projects
they are working with this summer ... considering they only 'opened up'
the floor on the 31st, and its closed already ... damn, that was a small
window of opportunity.
But, I've been told to contact the co-ordinator in
Dear People,
After a long time of various timeouts, I managed to get back on track
developing the long promised PQDN website. As some of you might know. I was
working on a project called the PostgreSQL Developer Network.
The websites (which is a la MSDN) is meant to provide a knowl
I am a MSEE student at Penn State (University Park), for the past few
months I have been working on modifying parts of PostgreSQL for my
research work. I doubt if my current work would serve any purpose for
pgsql since it is experimental and research oriented, but all the
same, I have gained famili
It is already being worked on ... more once we know more ...
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Vishal Kashyap @ [SaiHertz] wrote:
Dear all ,
Incidentally I havent seen any objections, if there are none should we go
ahead and whip up an email to google? Do we want to run this through the
We must go st
"Luke Lonergan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the data warehousing industry, data conversion and manipulation is
> normally kept distinct from data loading.
It's a bit strange to call this conversion or manipulation. One way or another
you have to escape whatever your delimiters are. How wo
>> 2) A modified command syntax for introducing a direct single row error
>> handling. By direct I mean - a row that if rejected from within the COPY
>> command context does not throw an error and rollsback the whole transaction.
>> Instead the error is caught and recorded elsewhere, maybe in some
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Vishal Kashyap @ [SaiHertz]
> Sent: 02 June 2005 16:19
> To: Robert Treat
> Cc: Jonah H. Harris; Marc G. Fournier;
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Googl
Steve,
> I can only think of one where it's common. Windows filenames.
Nearly all weblog data then.
> But if
> you're going to support arbitrary data in a load then whatever escape
> character you choose will appear sometimes.
If we allow an 8-bit character set in the "text" file, then yes, any
Dear all ,
>
> Incidentally I havent seen any objections, if there are none should we go
> ahead and whip up an email to google? Do we want to run this through the
We must go straight away for it.
I wonder why bigies like Bruce , Tom , Josh have not responded to this yet.
To my opinion the b
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 07:33:13AM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Oliver,
>
> > Haven't you just replaced one preprocessing step with another, then?
>
> Generally not. The most common problem with the current choice of escape
> character is that there are *lots* of data load scenarios with backsl
Cool. Thanks Marc.
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Yes, been working on this since last night ...
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
So, has anyone gone ahead and contacted Google yet?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all li
Oliver,
> Haven't you just replaced one preprocessing step with another, then?
Generally not. The most common problem with the current choice of escape
character is that there are *lots* of data load scenarios with backslash in
the text strings. The extra preprocessing to escape them is unneces
Andreas,
>> Escape processing would proceed as before, but the semantics would change to
>> allow the use of different characters as the escape character, in addition
>> to the special characters for delimiter and newline.
>
> If you mean syntax to specify escape and delimiter (and newline ?),
>
Yes, been working on this since last night ...
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
So, has anyone gone ahead and contacted Google yet?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send
So, has anyone gone ahead and contacted Google yet?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Escape processing would proceed as before, but the semantics would change to
> allow the use of different characters as the escape character, in addition
> to the special characters for delimiter and newline.
If you mean syntax to specify escape and delimiter (and newline ?),
that is a great a
On K, 2005-06-01 at 11:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think this should be a decision done when creating a table, just like
> > TEMP tables. So you always know if a certain table is or is not
> > safe/replicated/recoverable.
> > This has also the advanta
On K, 2005-06-01 at 18:05 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> What we could do is to do no-WAL automatically for empty tables (like
> when a database is first loaded),
You forget that some databases use WAL for PITR / replication and doing
it automatically there would surely mess up their replica.
How
20 matches
Mail list logo
