Hi, i have just installed 10.4 on one of our machines and cannot get
past this error during make
gcc -no-cpp-precomp -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -dynamiclib -install_name
/usr/local/pgsql/lib/libpq.4.dylib -compatibility_version 4
Jamie,
That's strange, I have 8.03 building fine on 10.4 ? Did you simply do
a make without a make clean and run configure again ?
Dave
On 20-Jul-05, at 3:37 AM, Jamie Deppeler wrote:
Hi, i have just installed 10.4 on one of our machines and cannot
get past this error during make
gcc
On 7/20/05, Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it's also possible to do partitioning with UNION ALL, maybe it
would be better if there was an option to explain that told it either to
show or not show info about eliminated partitions. That would seem to
serve the general case better
--On tisdag, juli 19, 2005 15.11.31 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-07/msg00096.php describes
what I think is causing octopus to fail. What's also interesting is
these patches from the FreeBSD
On Jul 20, 2005, at 5:58 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:
Hi, i have just installed 10.4 on one of our machines and cannot
get past this error during make
/usr/bin/libtool: for architecture: cputype (16777234) cpusubtype
(0) file: -lSystem is not an object file (not allowed in a library)
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And 7.3 is also failing, with a different error:
ccache gcc -traditional-cpp -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I../../../../src/include
-I/opt/local/include -c -o printtup.o printtup.c
In file included
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 22:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Short patch enclosed to turn off writing of commit-status hint bits.
Doesn't this entirely destroy the
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
We don't rely on any one write of them to work, but that doesn't mean
that we can indefinitely postpone writing them.
OK, I think I understand where you're coming from now.
Apparently not :-(
When
Tom Lane wrote:
This is a considerably bigger issue for the buildfarm than it would
be for ordinary users of our distribution, since in the distro it's
only the contrib modules that you actually need to run through your
local flex.
Couldn't we just run the distprep actions (flex, bison)
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Couldn't we just run the distprep actions (flex, bison) through contrib
as well? That wouldn't hurt anyone, I think.
No objection here (though of course it doesn't affect the buildfarm issue).
regards, tom lane
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:32:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
In short, OS X 10.2 wasn't a supported platform when 7.2/7.3 came out,
and I don't want to retroactively try to make it so.
All I needed to hear. I'll pull those from cuckoo's config.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 12:52:28PM +0200, Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
On 7/20/05, Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it's also possible to do partitioning with UNION ALL, maybe it
would be better if there was an option to explain that told it either to
show or not show info about
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 05:47:37PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 06:06:00PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:00]~/buildfarm/HEAD/pgsqlkeep.1121809875/src/pl/plpython:41%otool
-L libplpython.0.0.so
libplpython.0.0.so:
At least on my machine, the latest Cygwin seems to break
comprehensively, with a SEGV when starting postmaster. It looks like
it is failing ion the code that looks for the highest settable FD, but
it's hard to say - the stack gets corrupted so getting a reliable
backtrace is hard. Can
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
At least on my machine, the latest Cygwin seems to break
comprehensively, with a SEGV when starting postmaster. It looks like
it is failing ion the code that looks for the highest settable FD, but
it's hard to say - the stack gets corrupted so getting a reliable
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
The email below about FreeBSD's involvement in Google's Summer of Code
got me thinking; would there be value in trying to attract college
students to working on either PostgreSQL development, or using
PostgreSQL in projects? Even though we missed getting in on the summer
Did I miss a docbook upgrade or something here?
openjade -V draft-mode -D . -c /usr/local/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl/modular/catalog
-d stylesheet.dsl -i output-text -t sgml -V nochunks standalone-install.sgml
installation.sgml INSTALL.html
openjade:installation.sgml:873:44:X: reference to
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
openjade -V draft-mode -D . -c
/usr/local/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl/modular/catalog -d stylesheet.dsl -i
output-text -t sgml -V nochunks standalone-install.sgml installation.sgml
INSTALL.html
openjade:installation.sgml:873:44:X: reference to
There appear to be several bugs in the at time zone
patch recently applied.
show timezone;TimeZone
--UTC(1 row)
select
now();
now
---2005-07-20 23:38:57.981128+00(1
row)
***
WORKS ***
select CURRENT_DATE + '05:00'::time at time
zone
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
openjade -V draft-mode -D . -c /usr/local/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl/modular/catalog
-d stylesheet.dsl -i output-text -t sgml -V nochunks standalone-install.sgml
installation.sgml INSTALL.html
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Fixed --- but maybe we ought to do something to test the INSTALL/HISTORY
documentation build as well as the main SGML docs. Or maybe better, do
something to make failures of
Hi,
Having an issue with 10.4.2 at the moment when i initialize the
database no user is being created.
I have setup Postgresql 8.0.3 on 10.3 without any issue, has anyone come
accross this problem before?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2:
Do you already have a postgres user on the system? And do you mean
that initdb is not creating a postgres user in the database?
Presumably, if run as the user that will own the server process, it
should create that user in the database as well.
I am doing it right
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/initdb -D /usr/local/pgsql/data
Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
Do you already have a postgres user on the system? And do you mean
that initdb is not creating a postgres user in the database?
Presumably, if run as the user that will own the server
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 03:43:04PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
The email below about FreeBSD's involvement in Google's Summer of Code
got me thinking; would there be value in trying to attract college
students to working on either PostgreSQL development, or using
25 matches
Mail list logo
