On 29/10/05 4:47 am, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomorrow evening, I'm going to wrap up RC1, to announce it on Monday ...
if anyone is sitting on *anything*, please say something before about
midnight GMT ...
Don't include a link for the Windows version in your email please
Hi,
All regression tests passed on :
* SUSE LINUX 10.0 (i586) OSS
* Fedora Core release 4
* Red Hat Linux release 9
* Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 6)
Both are x86.
Regards,
--
Devrim GUNDUZ
Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr
devrim~gunduz.org,
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Tomorrow evening, I'm going to wrap up RC1, to announce it on Monday ...
if anyone is sitting on *anything*, please say something before about
midnight GMT ...
hmm well -HEAD(and 8.0.4 too!) is broken on AIX 5.3ML3:
You can have foreign keys between temp tables, just not between temp and
permanent tables. The latter case is either fairly silly, or
technically hard, depending on which direction you have in mind.
A temp table referencing a permanent table wouldn't be very silly IMHO...
Sander.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:54:31PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
You can have foreign keys between temp tables, just not between temp and
permanent tables. The latter case is either fairly silly, or
technically hard, depending on which direction you have in mind.
A temp table referencing a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Sander Steffann
Sent: Sat 10/29/2005 1:54 PM
To: josh@agliodbs.com; Tom Lane
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
You can have foreign keys between temp tables, just not
Stefan Kaltenbrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hmm well -HEAD(and 8.0.4 too!) is broken on AIX 5.3ML3:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01053.php
[ shrug... ] The reports of this problem have not given enough
information to fix it, and since it's not a regression from
Tom Lane wrote:
Stefan Kaltenbrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hmm well -HEAD(and 8.0.4 too!) is broken on AIX 5.3ML3:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01053.php
[ shrug... ] The reports of this problem have not given enough
information to fix it, and since it's
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
You solve it by allowing other backends to lock and examine your
temporary tables. But AIUI temporary tables are not stored in shared
memory so how do you get a consistant view of it?
Not unsolvable, but very tricky.
Right, the problem isn't
As some of you may remember, a patch for adding --as-needed to the GNU
linker command line was added [1] and subsequently removed [2] under
the mistaken assumption that it was a linker bug [3]. It isn't.
The bug is actually in readline, in that it doesn't declare its
dependancy on
At this stage, I am thinking this is best left for 8.2. It is
impossible for us to test it enough.
---
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
As some of you may remember, a patch for adding
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:47:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
At this stage, I am thinking this is best left for 8.2. It is
impossible for us to test it enough.
I agree. I missed the messages when it went in and missed where it came
out. So I looked into it and have found a solution, but
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
At this stage, I am thinking this is best left for 8.2. It is
impossible for us to test it enough.
Agreed --- the portability risks are way too high for 8.1.
I see no reason not to try it during the 8.2 cycle though.
This has been saved for the 8.2 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
As some of you may remember, a patch for adding
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 18:43 +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 05:05:25PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
3. Helping Readahead efficiency: Currently blocks are allocated one at a
time. If many tables are extending at the same time, the blocks from
multiple tables will be
Peter Ivarsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FATAL: could not read statistics message: Resource temporarily
unavailable
What platform is this on exactly, and what version of Postgres?
PostgreSQL version 8.0.4 and OS is OsX 10.3 on a Mac G4.
I spent some time trying to duplicate this on my
Take a look through it, will announce this evening ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4:
17 matches
Mail list logo
