Re: [HACKERS] Nightly builds

2006-03-26 Thread Magnus Hagander
> > I am game to write up some better instructions for > installing mingw to > > compile postgresql on Windows if there are any notes on > which packages > > need to be installed. I have successfully compiled and installed on > > Linux. > > I would be very grateful for this. > > It would als

Re: [HACKERS] Nightly builds

2006-03-26 Thread Albe Laurenz
> I am game to write up some better instructions for installing > mingw to compile postgresql on Windows if there are any notes > on which packages need to be installed. I have successfully > compiled and installed on Linux. I would be very grateful for this. It would also be very helpful to h

[HACKERS] Anniversary Registration now online

2006-03-26 Thread Josh Berkus
Folks, Please register as soon as you can. Speakers must register, too, thanks! http://conference.postgresql.org/Registration -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [HACKERS] Recovery from multi trouble

2006-03-26 Thread OKADA Satoshi
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: >On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:53:39AM +, Simon Riggs wrote: > > >>IMHO the problem is the deletion of the xlog file, not the error >>message. >> >>If you *did* lose an xlog file, would you not expect the system to come >>up anyway? You're saying that you'd want th

Re: [HACKERS] How to create the patch?

2006-03-26 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Dhanaraj M - Sun Microsystems said: > Hi all > > I fixed a bug. I downloaded the recent version of postgres using CVS. I > > made the changes and tested. I dont know how to create a patch. Should > i login and execute diff command? Can u explain the steps in detail?? > > > Please help me in this

[HACKERS] How to create the patch?

2006-03-26 Thread Dhanaraj M - Sun Microsystems
Hi all I fixed a bug. I downloaded the recent version of postgres using CVS. I made the changes and tested. I dont know how to create a patch. Should i login and execute diff command? Can u explain the steps in detail?? Please help me in this regard.. Thanks Dhanaraj -

Re: [HACKERS] FreeBSD ICU was Win32 unicode vs ICU

2006-03-26 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# kleptog@svana.org / 2006-03-26 15:53:24 +0200: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 02:13:28PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > Afaict, from the ICU website, ICU too uses CLDR. > > > Why reinvent the wheel? > > > > Just a thought: PHP is under a BSD-like (Apache-style) license. > > Does that mea

Bittorrent (Was: RE: [HACKERS] [SUGGESTION] CVSync )

2006-03-26 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Does anyone here know how to use the latest version of Bittorrent, from a server vs client, perspective? The one we are currently running is *ancient*, and I'd like to get that vServer upgraded and off the templates, but without someone that knows how to setup the newer bittorrent, well, tha

Re: [HACKERS] FreeBSD ICU was Win32 unicode vs ICU

2006-03-26 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 02:13:28PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > Afaict, from the ICU website, ICU too uses CLDR. > > Why reinvent the wheel? > > Just a thought: PHP is under a BSD-like (Apache-style) license. > Does that mean they're going to rewrite ICU under their license? Near as

Re: [HACKERS] FreeBSD ICU was Win32 unicode vs ICU

2006-03-26 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-08-25 04:53:47 +1000: > Kevin McArthur Wrote: > > > Should the postgresql project also be looking at CLDR for > > cross-platform unicode support? > > Afaict, from the ICU website, ICU too uses CLDR. > Why reinvent the wheel? Just a thought: PHP is under a BSD-like

Re: [HACKERS] [SUGGESTION] CVSync

2006-03-26 Thread Magnus Hagander
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Is there any reason why we don't allow rsync access to the > cvs repo? > > > > That'd be Marc's bailiwick not mine ... but rsync from the anoncvs > > mirror seems like it couldn't pose any serious security threat. > > Marc? > > I can't think

Re: [HACKERS] Role incompatibilities

2006-03-26 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Stephen Frost wrote: > I also feel that we really can't do what > the SQL spec requires without seperating users from roles as I don't > beleve you're supposed to be able to grant users to roles or set role > to a user. Actually, for my proposal to work, we *must* keep users and roles the same.