Tom,
> or is the real
> problem that it'd take a whole lot of both OO-fu and Postgres-fu?
> If so, can we find someone with the former nature to collaborate with?
OO-Fu, mostly. I've already posted to the DBA project on OOo.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
-
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 07:04:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > libreadline is not a problem because you can distribute postgresql
>> > compiled with readline and comply with all licences involved
>> > simultaneously. It doesn't work with openssl because the licence
>> > requires things that
Then again PGfoundry is great to keep development centered, but
finding and building a new package is not really a one-liner, and
if you're unlucky you might get alpha-quality code installed. :)
Mammoth PostgreSQL was designed to fill this role. It is an FOSS project
(www.mammothpostgresql.or
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:36:25AM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really think that PostgreSQL could benefit from a packaged solution
> that incorporates a lot of the contrib stuff (tsearch2, maybe even some
> replication setups ..). I really like the approach that PostgreSQL is a
> clea
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 06:01:19PM -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 5/19/06, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >And with that, I am going to sit in a lawn chair and watch the bonfire.
>
> This is one of the finest examples of unfocused discussions I've ever
> seen on -hackers... while
>
> My question is whether psql using libreadline.so has to be GPL, meaning
> the psql source has to be included in a binary distribution.
If I understand what I have been told by lawyers, here's what using a GPL,
and NOT LGPL, library means:
According to RMS, the definition of a derivitive work
> What I was hoping someone had was a function that could find the substring
> runs in something less than a strlen1*strlen2 number of operations and a
> numerically sane way of representing the similarity or difference.
Acually, it is more like strlen1*strlen2*N, where N is the number of valid
r
On 5/20/06, Lukas Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The improvements to the installer are great, but there simply needs to
be a packaged solution that adds more of the things people are very
likely to use. From my understanding Bizgres goes in that direction? I
just think that whatever highly pack
> Get pg_trgm http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/oddmuse/index.cgi/ReadmeTrgm
> It doesn't depends on language.
That's an interesting approach.
This is what I got:
apps$ ./stratest "pink floyd dark side of the moon money" "dark side of
the moon pink floyd"
Match: dark side of the moon
Match: pink flo
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
...
>> apt-get install postgresql-8.1 postgresql-contrib-8.1
>>
>> Voila! Tsearch installed at your fingertips. What else were you
>> expecting?
>
> I expect this to be one package and I expect this to be what is pushed
> as the default package on all platforms. If someone
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:36:25AM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote:
The improvements to the installer are great, but there simply needs to
be a packaged solution that adds more of the things people are very
likely to use. From my understanding Bizgres goes in that directi
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:36:25AM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote:
> The improvements to the installer are great, but there simply needs to
> be a packaged solution that adds more of the things people are very
> likely to use. From my understanding Bizgres goes in that direction? I
> just think that w
Hi,
I really think that PostgreSQL could benefit from a packaged solution
that incorporates a lot of the contrib stuff (tsearch2, maybe even some
replication setups ..). I really like the approach that PostgreSQL is a
clean yet highly extensible base from which other people can build their
sp
13 matches
Mail list logo
