Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Contrib module to examine client certificate

2006-09-01 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I assume this is something we want in /contrib, right? Peter posted an updated version, I believe. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Contrib module to examine client

2006-09-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I assume this is something we want in /contrib, right? Peter posted an updated version, I believe. Ah, it was lower in my mailbox. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDBhttp://www.enterprisedb.com + If

Re: [HACKERS] Getting a move on for 8.2 beta

2006-09-01 Thread Gregory Stark
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Well, no, it's not. We have told people till we're blue in the face post early, post often. Now I will plead guilty to not always having spent as much time giving feedback on draft patches as I should've, but the process is

Re: [HACKERS] Getting a move on for 8.2 beta

2006-09-01 Thread Gregory Stark
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As an extreme example consider the new Linux release cycle. They have a non-freeze period of a couple weeks, followed by months of frozen time. Users who want to try out new features on different hardware can do

<    1   2