On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:11 +0200, Michael Paesold wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Here's an updated WIP version of the LDC patch. I just spreads the
writes, that achieves the goal of smoothing the checkpoint I/O spikes. I
think sorting the writes etc. is interesting but falls in the
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
So, added to my plan
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00618.php)
n) single encoded files. That will touch snowball, ispell, synonym, thesaurus
and simple dictionaries
n+1) use encoding names instead of locale's names in configuration
FYI, I
All,
Where is the most current version of this patch? I want to test it on TPCE,
but there seem to be 4-5 different versions floating around, and the patch
tracker hasn't been updated.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
---(end of
Tasneem,
For example: For 6,
the range defined by NEAR is: 4 – 8 For
2147,483,647, the range defined by NEAR is: 1717,986,917 –
2576,980,377 But yes, for other cases it may not give good results. We can
give the option for the user to specify the
A message entitled Having Fun With PostgreSQL was posted to Bugtraq
today. I haven't read through the paper yet so I don't know if the
author discusses security problems that need attention or if the
article is more like a compilation of Stupid PostgreSQL Tricks.
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A message entitled Having Fun With PostgreSQL was posted to Bugtraq
today. I haven't read through the paper yet so I don't know if the
author discusses security problems that need attention or if the
article is more like a compilation of Stupid
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Michael Fuhr wrote:
A message entitled Having Fun With PostgreSQL was posted to Bugtraq
today. I haven't read through the paper yet so I don't know if the
author discusses security problems that need attention or if the
article is more like a compilation of Stupid
I have completed my first pass over the tsearch documentation:
http://momjian.us/expire/fulltext/HTML/sql.html
They are from section 14 and following.
I have come up with a number of questions that I placed in SGML comments
in these files:
On Friday 15 June 2007 13:29, Greg Smith wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Umar Farooq wrote:
Surprisingly, no matter what type of query I execute, when I use strace
to monitor the system calls generated they turn out to be the same for
ALL sorts of queries.
How are you calling strace? The
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Gregory Stark wrote:
But what you're concerned about is not OLTP performance at all.
It's an OLTP system most of the time that periodically gets unexpectedly
high volume. The TPC-E OLTP test suite actually has a MarketFeed
component to in it that has similar properties
10 matches
Mail list logo
