On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 13:38 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
On Thursday 02 July 2009 12:40:49 Simon Riggs wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 11:19 -0400, Caleb Cushing wrote:
A couple of times I've been told you don't need tinyint, use boolean
which is not true, several projects I've worked on I've
On Jul 3, 2009, at 11:56 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
It seems to be inconsistent. Probably because everything wound up
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The main reason contrib still has the alternate method is that PGXS
doesn't really work until after you've installed the core build.
For modules distributed separately from core, it doesn't seem that
exciting to be able to build
Hi,
in a continued effort for better Informix ESQL/C compatibility,
we added the string pseudo-type handling to ECPG.
This type in ESQL/C is documented as:
--
The string Data Type
The string data type is an ESQL/C data type that holds character
Boszormenyi Zoltan z...@cybertec.at writes:
in a continued effort for better Informix ESQL/C compatibility,
we added the string pseudo-type handling to ECPG.
...
- string has become a type name, reserved word in ECPG.
This seems like a sufficient reason to reject the patch. Who knows
what
Hi,
Tom Lane írta:
Boszormenyi Zoltan z...@cybertec.at writes:
in a continued effort for better Informix ESQL/C compatibility,
we added the string pseudo-type handling to ECPG.
...
- string has become a type name, reserved word in ECPG.
This seems like a sufficient reason to
Hello,
I can't to find reason of my problem. I have a varlena type. This type
works well with plain storage, but this raise some random exception
with extended storage. It finish on Assert((data - start) ==
data_size)[heaptuple.c]; I checked - when I return varlena from in
function, then it has
It's pretty hard to guess where your bug is sitting here with no code
and no idea even what you've done to trigger it.
At a guess there someplace you haven't detoasted a datum that had to
be detoasted. But like I said that's just a guess.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Greg Starkgsst...@mit.edu wrote:
It's pretty hard to guess where your bug is sitting here with no code
and no idea even what you've done to trigger it.
At a guess there someplace you haven't detoasted a datum that had to
be detoasted. But like I said that's
On Saturday 04 July 2009 01:19:23 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 17:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I guess I'm not really seeing why that particular thing should be a
button rather than a link. It would mess up the formatting for no
obvious benefit.
Not arguing one way or the
Le 5 juil. 09 à 00:13, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
On Saturday 04 July 2009 01:19:23 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Not arguing one way or the other, a button says, I am about to
perform
X. A link *always* says, I am about to go to a new web page.
That was my feeling.
And bots (google etc) will
On Jul 4, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com
wrote:
Le 5 juil. 09 à 00:13, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
On Saturday 04 July 2009 01:19:23 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Not arguing one way or the other, a button says, I am about to
perform
X. A link *always* says, I am about
Joe Conway wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Consistency here is pointless. IIRC the dual method is used in contrib
because people did not trust the PGXS stuff enough to rip the original
Make code out; or maybe because people
2009/7/4 Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Greg Starkgsst...@mit.edu wrote:
It's pretty hard to guess where your bug is sitting here with no code
and no idea even what you've done to trigger it.
see attachment - sorry, comments are czech
At a guess there someplace
14 matches
Mail list logo
