On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 14:48 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I think the consensus is to change this setting to a boolean. If you
don't want to do it, I am sure we can find someone who will.
You expect others to act on consensus and follow rules, yet ignore them
yourself when it suits your
Hi
I've just compiled the 9.0 beta1 source tarball and am testing my
custom application against it (which has been running on PostgreSQL
since 7.3 or so).
The below statement results in the following error message:
ERROR: btree index keys must be ordered by attribute
evidently in relation
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I think everyone agrees the current code is unusable, per Heikki's
comment about a WAL file arriving after a period of no WAL
activity
I don't.
I am curious to hear how many complaints we've had from alpha and
beta testers of HS regarding this issue. I know that if
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
I like the proposal of a boolean because it provides only the minimal
feature set of two cases that are both clearly needed and easily
implementable. Whatever we do later is certain to provide a superset
of those two cases. If we do something else (and
On May 9, 2010, at 13:59 , Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
I like the proposal of a boolean because it provides only the minimal
feature set of two cases that are both clearly needed and easily
implementable. Whatever we do later is certain to provide a superset
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 05:48:27PM +0900, Ian Barwick wrote:
Hi
I've just compiled the 9.0 beta1 source tarball and am testing my
custom application against it (which has been running on PostgreSQL
since 7.3 or so).
The below statement results in the following error message:
ERROR:
2010/5/9 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 05:48:27PM +0900, Ian Barwick wrote:
Hi
I've just compiled the 9.0 beta1 source tarball and am testing my
custom application against it (which has been running on PostgreSQL
since 7.3 or so).
The below statement results in the
Ian Barwick barw...@gmail.com writes:
2010/5/9 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
A self-contained way to reproduce this, ideally small, would be
fantastic :)
s/fantastic/absolutely required to do anything with this report/
I will see if I can knock together a reproducible test case, might
take
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The use cases are covered as best they can be without better support from
expected future SR features like heartbeats and XID loopback.
For what it's worth I think deferring these extra complications is a
very useful
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The use cases are covered as best they can be without better support from
expected future SR features like heartbeats and XID loopback.
For what it's
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 23:55 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Uh, did we decide that 'wal_keep_segments' was the best name for this
GUC setting? I know we shipped beta1 using that name.
I
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 20:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On Sunday 09 May 2010 01:34:18 Bruce Momjian wrote:
I think everyone agrees the current code is unusable, per Heikki's
comment about a WAL file arriving after a period of no WAL activity, and
look
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 16:10 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
Adding pause/resume seems to introduce some non-trivial locking
problems, though. How would you handle a pause request if the recovery
process currently held a lock?
(We are only talking about AccessExclusiveLocks here. No LWlocks are
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
The only remaining option is to continue applying WAL until you reach
a point where no locks are held, then pause. But from a user's POV
that is nearly indistinguishable from simply setting
hot_standby_conflict_winner to in the first place I think.
Not
On May 9, 2010, at 21:04 , Simon Riggs wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 16:10 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
Adding pause/resume seems to introduce some non-trivial locking
problems, though. How would you handle a pause request if the recovery
process currently held a lock?
(We are only talking
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com wrote:
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
The only remaining option is to continue applying WAL until you reach
a point where no locks are held, then pause. But from a user's POV
that is nearly indistinguishable from
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 16:01 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
The fact that Hot Standby has to take exclusive locks that can't
be released until WAL replay has progressed to a certain point seems
like a fairly serious wart.
LOL
And people lecture me about design.
--
Simon Riggs
Traffic on the PostgreSQL lists is very high now and I freely admit that
reading every email is simply not possible for me, even the ones that
mention topics that keyword searches tell me are of potential interest.
If anybody knows of a bug or suspected bug in my code, I have no problem
in being
On May 9, 2010, at 22:01 , Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com
wrote:
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
The only remaining option is to continue applying WAL until you reach
a point where no locks are held, then pause. But from a
On Monday 10 May 2010 00:25:44 Florian Pflug wrote:
On May 9, 2010, at 22:01 , Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com
wrote:
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
The only remaining option is to continue applying WAL until you reach
a
Hi
2010/5/10 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Ian Barwick barw...@gmail.com writes:
2010/5/9 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
A self-contained way to reproduce this, ideally small, would be
fantastic :)
s/fantastic/absolutely required to do anything with this report/
Yes, I appreciate that :) I
2010/5/10 Ian Barwick barw...@gmail.com:
SELECT ov.object_id
FROM object_version ov
WHERE ov.object_id = 1
AND ov.version ='0
AND ov.object_status_id = (
SELECT MAX(ov1.object_status_id)
FROM object_version ov1
WHERE ov1.object_id=ov.object_id
AND
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On Monday 10 May 2010 00:25:44 Florian Pflug wrote:
On May 9, 2010, at 22:01 , Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com
wrote:
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
The
Ian Barwick barw...@gmail.com writes:
Apologies, slight cp error; correct version of query:
SELECT ov.object_id
FROM object_version ov
WHERE ov.object_id = 1
AND ov.version =0
AND ov.object_status_id = (
SELECT MAX(ov1.object_status_id)
FROM object_version ov1
24 matches
Mail list logo
