On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:33:04PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Boxuan Zhai bxzhai2...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
This is ZHAI BOXUAN, a student of gSoC 2010. My project is to add merge
command in postgres.
There is a more detailed instruction in readme.
I
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 16:57 +0200, Yeb Havinga wrote:
Hello list,
Due to dependency requirements my development
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2010-07-07 at 16:37 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
Here's the patch to add the 'xml_is_well_formed' function.
I suppose we should remove the function from contrib/xml2 at the same
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:52:31AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:33:04PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Boxuan Zhai bxzhai2...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
This is ZHAI BOXUAN, a student of gSoC 2010. My project is to add merge
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
Please find enclosed a patch against git master as of
7b2668159bb4d0f5177a23d05bf7c2ab00bc0d75. It works up to make, but
fails on make check.
There seem to be about four different comment styles used in this patch,
none of which match the project
On Jul 10, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
Please find enclosed a patch against git master as of
7b2668159bb4d0f5177a23d05bf7c2ab00bc0d75. It works up to make, but
fails on make check.
There seem to be about four different comment
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 09:26:38AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:52:31AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:33:04PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Boxuan Zhai bxzhai2...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
This is
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Though, if the worst problem with this patch is the formatting, we're doing
*quite* well.
Well, the worst problem with it is that it hasn't touched the
interesting part, ie, what happens at execution time. I haven't
seen a design for that, which means
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 01:18:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Though, if the worst problem with this patch is the formatting, we're doing
*quite* well.
Well, the worst problem with it is that it hasn't touched the
interesting part, ie, what happens
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:39:02AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 01:18:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Though, if the worst problem with this patch is the formatting, we're
doing *quite* well.
Well, the worst problem with it
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
By the way, make check fails here with attached initdb.log:
creating system views ... FATAL: unrecognized token: false
Hm, I'd suspect something fouled up in keyword recognition.
Did you do a make clean and rebuild?
BTW, this patch is still a few bricks
On lör, 2010-07-10 at 09:26 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
Please find enclosed a patch against git master as of
7b2668159bb4d0f5177a23d05bf7c2ab00bc0d75. It works up to make, but
fails on make check.
It looks like this implementation reaches about the same level of parser
support as the stuff
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 01:53:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
By the way, make check fails here with attached initdb.log:
creating system views ... FATAL: unrecognized token: false
Hm, I'd suspect something fouled up in keyword recognition. Did you
do
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:04 PM, C?dric Villemain
cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
I assume this did not get done for 9.0. ?Do we want a TODO item?
Yes.
Added:
? ? ? ?Reduce locking required for ALTER commands
I just faced production issue where it is
Magnus Hagander wrote:
An easy approximation would be to make the code #ifdef SIO_KEEPALIVE_VALS.
That would fail if the mingw guys decide to provide the #define without
adding the struct at the same time, but that seems moderately unlikely.
Seems reasonable. I'll go do something along
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 01:53:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, this patch is still a few bricks shy of a load, since there's
no kwlist.h change and so the new MERGE keyword couldn't possibly be
recognized. More generally, I'm wondering why the original
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
That laves the questions of docs - right now the docs just say it
works on windows. I guess we need to add some kind of disclaimer
around that, but the fact is that for 99+% of our windows users it
will work - since they use the
On lör, 2010-07-10 at 16:23 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Wow, how would they know if the binaries are MinGW compiled? Does it
show in version()?
Yes, I think so.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, I notice that that page fails to mention anything about preferred
window width. I believe the project standard is to make things readable
in an 80-column window --- anyone have an objection to stating that
explicitly?
No, on the contrary, I'm in favor of stating
On fre, 2010-06-11 at 07:00 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The second problem is that the prototype check for accept() fails.
This
is because glibc defines the second argument to be a transparent
union, apparently to make it look like a lot of things at once.
clang
apparently doesn't
On lör, 2010-07-10 at 12:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I believe the project standard is to make things readable
in an 80-column window --- anyone have an objection to stating that
explicitly?
Is that what pgindent reformats it to?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On lör, 2010-07-10 at 12:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I believe the project standard is to make things readable
in an 80-column window --- anyone have an objection to stating that
explicitly?
Is that what pgindent reformats it to?
pgindent tries to
contrib/stringfunc was missing this small change in contrib/Makefile, I think.
With it, it
installs and runs make check cleanly.
Erik Rijkers
stringfunc_fix.diff
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
23 matches
Mail list logo
