On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi wrote:
I have no idea why it worked in the past, but the patch was never designed
to work for UPSERT. This has been discussed in the past and some people
thought that that's not a huge deal.
I think it's expected to
We haven't seen any updated patches in a long, long time...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:14:37PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
Perhaps. ?A few kooky rows is indeed common, but we're talking about a
specific
breed of kookiness: 99.9% of the rows have identical bits after an ALTER
TYPE
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:14:37PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
Perhaps. ?A few kooky rows is indeed common, but we're talking about a
specific
breed of
Here's another attempt to reduce the number of places in the code that
need to be updated when adding a new relkind. It adds a few macros --
RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE(), RELKIND_HAS_SYSTEM_ATTS(), and
RELKIND_HAS_SYSTEM_GENERATED_ATTNAMES() and uses them in place of more
ad-hoc tests for the same
Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
I have no idea why it worked in the past, but the patch was never
designed to work for UPSERT. This has been discussed in the past and
some people thought that that's not a huge deal.
It takes an excessively large lock when doing UPSERT, which means its
performance
2010/12/29 Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr
Please have a look at getddl:
https://github.com/dimitri/getddl
Nice! Looks like a nifty tool.
When I tried it, ./getddl.py -f -F /crypt/funcs -d glue, I got the error
No such file or directory: 'sql/schemas.sql'.
While the task of
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
