On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Or we could bite the bullet and start using str_tolower(), but the
performance implications of that are unpleasant; not to mention that
we really don't want to re-introduce the Turkish problem with
unexpected handling of i/I
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 16:26, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 16:17, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 14:43, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, the text is not accurate:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Nikhil Sontakke
nikhil.sonta...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
The fix is similar to the earlier commit by Tom. I tested this fix
against 8.3.13. We lock the parent catalog now before calling
index_open. Patch against git HEAD attached with this mail. I guess we
will
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I just applied a doc patch for pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp, and the
text now says:
? ? ? entryGet timestamp of last transaction replayed during recovery.
? ? ? ?This is the time at which the
On 2011-03-18 18:25, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Simon Riggssi...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 09:33 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Thanks for the review!
Lets have a look here...
You've added a test inside the lock to see if there is a standby, which
I
Hi,
The fix is similar to the earlier commit by Tom. I tested this fix
against 8.3.13. We lock the parent catalog now before calling
index_open. Patch against git HEAD attached with this mail. I guess we
will backpatch this? Tom's last commit was backpatched till 8.2 I
think.
Is it
Marko Kreen mark...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Or we could bite the bullet and start using str_tolower(), but the
performance implications of that are unpleasant; not to mention that
we really don't want to re-introduce the Turkish
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Here's an updated patch that removes this log message, and adds a few
lines to initdb to create a combination of ident/peer rows. And
finally, adds docs.
Comments?
As near as I can tell (I hate reading u-style diffs) you've documented
the ident and
On 18 Mar 2011, at 21:12, Robert Haas wrote:
While investigating Simon's complaint about my patch of a few days
ago, I discovered that synchronous replication appears to slow to a
crawl if fsync is turned off on the standby.
I'm not sure why this is happening or what the right behavior is
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 17:44, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 13:43, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When I ran pg_basebackup with -x, -P and -v options, I encountered
the following odd output.
$ pg_basebackup -D hoge -x -P -v
xlog
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 16:24, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Here's an updated patch that removes this log message, and adds a few
lines to initdb to create a combination of ident/peer rows. And
finally, adds docs.
Comments?
As near as I can
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 16:24, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
... The docs need
to state the truth, namely that ident is still allowed as a synonym
for peer on local connections. Otherwise people will get confused
as to why their pg_hba files
I wrote:
ISTM there are basically three things we might do about this:
(1) Decide that the patch's behavior is correct and what's embodied in
the regression expected file is wrong.
(2) Allow collations to propagate up through nodes that deliver
noncollatable outputs.
(3) Decide that
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Marko Kreen mark...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Or we could bite the bullet and start using str_tolower(), but the
performance implications of that are unpleasant; not
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 17:39, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 16:24, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
... The docs need
to state the truth, namely that ident is still allowed as a synonym
for peer on local connections.
Hi!
The PostgreSQL project has been accepted into the Google Summer of Code 2011.
Students may begin submitting proposals starting March 28, concluding
on April 8.
Development work runs from May 23 through August 15. For students,
suggested projects, ideas and details are at:
On 03/18/2011 10:48 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
the least of the evils. I guess we should document it, though, so
nobody has a false expectation that seeing something on the replica
means that a connection looking at the master will see something
that current.
Agreed. Note, however, that even
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
g...@pointblue.com.pl wrote:
On 18 Mar 2011, at 21:12, Robert Haas wrote:
While investigating Simon's complaint about my patch of a few days
ago, I discovered that synchronous replication appears to slow to a
crawl if fsync is turned off
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Nikhil Sontakke
nikhil.sonta...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Not really a performance issue AFAICS. If the relcache init file exists,
then the phase2 of the catalog cache which eventually calls the above code
path is avoided.
Oh, that doesn't sound so bad, then.
2011/3/19 Vaibhav Kaushal vaibhavkaushal...@gmail.com:
Hello hom,
Frankly I am a learner as well. The experts here are almost always ready
to help and would be a better source of information.
Moreover I am also using eclipse but I do not use it for building the
source. I use it only as a
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
Testing 'methodology' sounds a bit heavy. I tested a number of patch
versions over time, with 30 second, hourly and nightly pgbench runs. The
nightly more for durability/memory leak testing than tps numbers, since I
21 matches
Mail list logo
