Hi guys,
I have added the '-n' option to pg_archivecleanup which performs a
dry-run and outputs the names of the files to be removed to stdout
(making possible to pass the list via pipe to another process).
Please find attached the small patch. I submit it to the CommitFest.
Thanks,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 15:52, Gabriele Bartolini
gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it wrote:
Hi guys,
I have added the '-n' option to pg_archivecleanup which performs a dry-run
and outputs the names of the files to be removed to stdout (making possible
to pass the list via pipe to another
On 2011-12-06 17:58, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Kevin Grittnerkgri...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Yeb Havingayebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
I personally tend to believe it doesn't even need to be an error.
There is no technical reason not to allow it. All the user needs
to do is make sure that the
Hi,
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
Hm. I just noticed a relatively big hole in the patch: The handling of
deletion of dependent objects currently is nonexistant because they don't go
through ProcessUtility...
That's the reason why we're talking about “command triggers” rather than
On sön, 2011-12-11 at 04:26 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
Building a CreateStmt seems to work well enough so far.
The only problem with that approach so far that I found is that:
CREATE TABLE collate_test2
(
a
On lör, 2011-12-10 at 16:16 +0100, Yeb Havinga wrote:
* ExecGrant_type() prevents 'grant usage on domain' on a type, but the
converse is possible.
postgres=# create domain myint as int2;
CREATE DOMAIN
postgres=# grant usage on type myint to public;
GRANT
This is the same as how we handle
2011/12/6 Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net:
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 23:32, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 06:55:51AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
eu...@timbira.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 09:47:53AM +0100, Gabriele Bartolini wrote:
Il 20/11/11 14:05, Noah Misch ha scritto:
What about making ON UPDATE CASCADE an error? That way, we can say that
ARRAY
action always applies to array elements, and plainaction always
applies to
entire rows.
SET
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:08:32AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
The least we could do is invent some non-spec syntax that makes the
intention clear, rather than having the system assume that an error case
was intended to mean something else. Maybe
pids INTEGER[] ARRAY REFERENCES pt,
+1.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
As of commit fc6d1006bda783cc002c61a5f072905849dbde4b, the regression
tests leave an unused role sitting around, because that commit removed
DROP ROLE regress_test_role_super;
from foreign_data.sql. Was that
Hello folks,
I just bumped into a situation where I wanted to do a little macaddr
arithmetic in postgres. I note that the inet type has support for
bitwise AND, OR and NOT, as well as subtraction, but macaddr has none
of the above.
These operations are easy to perform in C, but relatively a
2011/12/12 Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com:
Hello folks,
I just bumped into a situation where I wanted to do a little macaddr
arithmetic in postgres. I note that the inet type has support for
bitwise AND, OR and NOT, as well as subtraction, but macaddr has none
of the above.
These
12 matches
Mail list logo
