On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:15:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
There might be something to the idea of demoting a few of the things
we've traditionally had as NOTICEs, though. IME, the following two
messages account for a huge percentage of the chatter:
On 8 June 2012 09:14, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Hello, I will make this patch start again for this CF.
The requirement for this patch is as follows.
- What I want to get is similarity of the behaviors between
master and (hot-)standby concerning checkpoint
Le vendredi 29 juin 2012 04:26:42, Tom Lane a écrit :
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
Well, I think it's plausible but wrong under at least some common
circumstances. In addition to seeking, it ignores FS cache effects
(not that I have any idea how to account for these
[Resending as the original post didn't get through to the list]
Warming up an old thread here - we ran into the same problem.
Database is 9.1.4/x86_64 from Debian/testing. The client application
is bucardo hammering the database with NOTIFYs (including some
master-master replication conflicts,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Rob Wultsch wult...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:16 AM, David E. Wheeler da...@justatheory.com
wrote:
Hackers,
Very interesting design document for SQLite 4:
http://www.sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/design.wiki
I'm particularly intrigued by
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 27 June 2012 18:24, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
will never become sync standby even
if their name is in synchronous_standby_names.
I don't understand why you'd want that.
What is wrong with removing
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
You agreed to add something like NOSYNC option into START_REPLICATION
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
cases where people are modifying the wrong hba file. Can we show
the source text of the hba line?
We don't
2012-06-19 09:24 keltezéssel, Andres Freund írta:
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 04:12:47 AM Steve Singer wrote:
On 12-06-18 07:30 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hrmpf #666. I will go through through the series commit-by-commit again
to make sure everything compiles again. Reordinging this late
Hi,
trying to review this one according to
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch
# Is the patch in context diff format
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diff#Context_format?
No. (Does this requirement still apply after PostgreSQL switched to GIT?)
# Does it apply cleanly to the
On Friday, June 29, 2012 02:43:49 PM Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2012-06-19 09:24 keltezéssel, Andres Freund írta:
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 04:12:47 AM Steve Singer wrote:
On 12-06-18 07:30 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hrmpf #666. I will go through through the series commit-by-commit again
to
Hi,
On Friday, June 29, 2012 02:43:52 PM Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
trying to review this one according to
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch
# Is the patch in context diff format
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diff#Context_format?
No. (Does this requirement still apply after
2012-06-21 23:53 keltezéssel, Simon Riggs írta:
On 21 June 2012 19:13, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
2012/6/8 Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com:
I have a prototype that has some of these characteristics,
2012-06-29 15:01 keltezéssel, Andres Freund írta:
Hi,
On Friday, June 29, 2012 02:43:52 PM Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
trying to review this one according to
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch
# Is the patch in context diff format
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diff#Context_format?
2012-04-25 11:40 keltezéssel, Kohei KaiGai írta:
2012/3/10 Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:40 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:02 PM, David E. Wheelerda...@justatheory.com
wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Turned out to be a bit more work than I thought, since the current
parser reads pg_hba byte by byte, and not line by line. So I had to
change that. See attached, seems reasonable?
A couple of comments:
* In some places you have if ((c =
2012/6/29 Boszormenyi Zoltan z...@cybertec.at:
2012-04-25 11:40 keltezéssel, Kohei KaiGai írta:
2012/3/10 Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net
wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:40 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:02
Thank you. Please do let me know once fix check-in. I will test it and
share feedback with you. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Asif Naeem
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Jan Urbański wulc...@wulczer.org wrote:
On 27/06/12 13:57, Jan Urbański wrote:
On 27/06/12 11:51, Asif Naeem wrote:
Hi,
On
2012-06-29 16:44 keltezéssel, Kohei KaiGai írta:
2012/6/29 Boszormenyi Zoltan z...@cybertec.at:
2012-04-25 11:40 keltezéssel, Kohei KaiGai írta:
2012/3/10 Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net
wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:40 PM,
On 13.06.2012 14:28, Andres Freund wrote:
A logical WALReceiver is started directly by Postmaster when we enter PM_RUN
state and the new parameter multimaster_conninfo is set. For now only one of
those is started, but the code doesn't rely on that. In future multiple ones
should be allowed.
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 13.06.2012 14:28, Andres Freund wrote:
A logical WALReceiver is started directly by Postmaster when we
enter PM_RUN state and the new parameter multimaster_conninfo is
set. For now only one of those is started, but the code
On Friday, June 29, 2012 05:16:11 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 13.06.2012 14:28, Andres Freund wrote:
A logical WALReceiver is started directly by Postmaster when we enter
PM_RUN state and the new parameter multimaster_conninfo is set. For now
only one of those is started, but the code
On 29.06.2012 18:28, Kevin Grittner wrote:
It would be nice if there was at least a thin layer of the sender
portion which could by used by a stand-alone program. I can think
of lots of useful reasons to T the WAL stream -- passing through
the stream with little or no modification to at least
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
The auth_counter is just an proof-of-concept patch, so, it is helpful if you
could provide another use case that can make sense.
what about pgbouncer?
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie jun 29 01:04:13 -0400 2012:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org writes:
I propose this patch which echoes the commands to the respective log
files. I would backpatch this to 9.2.
OK, but the fflush just before fclose seems a bit pointless;
Hi,
I'll reply to Jeff with a brief thank you to Robert the bottom.
First of all, here's an update:
I have slightly modified the patch, I'll attach what I have at the moment. The
main difference are
- loops around the pthread_mutex calls: As the locking function signature is to
return void
According to the Google, there is absolutely no way of gettIng MacOS X
not to overcommit like crazy.
Well, this is one of a long list of broken things about OSX. If you
want to see *real* breakage, do some IO performance testing of HFS+
FWIW, I have this issue with Mac desktop applications
On Friday, June 29, 2012 07:07:11 PM Nils Goroll wrote:
Also, 20 transactions per connection is not enough of a run to make
any evaluation on.
As you can see I've repeated the tests 10 times. I've tested slight
variations as mentioned above, so I was looking for quick results with
You need at the very, very least 10s.
ok, thanks.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
change_varattnos_of_a_node(), which is used to adjust expressions
referencing a parent relation or LIKE source relation to refer to the
child relation, ignores whole-row Vars (those with attnum zero).
Thus, after processing the expression, the whole-row Var still claims
to have the rowtype
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
The other thing which will avoid the problem for most Mac users is if we
simply allocate 10% of RAM at initdb as a default. If we do that, then
90% of users will never touch Shmem themselves, and not have the
opportunity to mess up.
If we could do that
Tom,
If we could do that on *all* platforms, I might be for it, but we only
know how to get that number on some platforms.
I don't see what's wrong with using it where we can get it, and not
using it where we can't.
There's also the issue
of whether we really want to assume that the
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
If we could do that on *all* platforms, I might be for it, but we only
know how to get that number on some platforms.
I don't see what's wrong with using it where we can get it, and not
using it where we can't.
Because then we still need to define, and
10% isn't assuming dedicated.
Really?
Yes. As I said, the allocation for dedicated PostgreSQL servers is
usually 20% to 25%, up to 8GB.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
10% isn't assuming dedicated.
Really?
Yes. As I said, the allocation for dedicated PostgreSQL servers is
usually 20% to 25%, up to 8GB.
Any percentage is assuming dedicated, IMO. 25% might be the more common
number, but you're still assuming that you
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Friday, June 29, 2012 07:07:11 PM Nils Goroll wrote:
Also, 20 transactions per connection is not enough of a run to make
any evaluation on.
As you can see I've repeated the tests 10 times. I've tested slight
2012-06-27 10:34 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
2012-06-26 18:49 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
Excerpts from Boszormenyi Zoltan's message of mar jun 26 12:43:34 -0400 2012:
So, should I keep the enum TimeoutName? Are global variables for
keeping dynamically assigned values
My idea of not dedicated is I can launch a dozen postmasters on this
machine, and other services too, and it'll be okay as long as they're
not doing too much.
Oh, 128MB then?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 01:26:58AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
About the new --maintenance-db options:
What is the purpose of these options? The initial discussion was
unclear on this. The documentation contains no explanation of why they
should be used. If we want to really support the
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:57:36AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
In retrospect, it seems as though it might have been a good idea to
make the postgres database read-only and undroppable, so that all
client utilities could count on being able to connect to it and get a
list of databases in the
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 02:58:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun jun 25 11:57:36 -0400 2012:
Really, I think
pg_upgrade needs this option too, unless we're going to kill
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:12:00PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun jun 25 14:58:25 -0400 2012:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun jun 25 11:57:36 -0400
Hi All,
In a *very* quick patch I tested using huge pages/MAP_HUGETLB for the mmap'ed
memory.
That gives around 9.5% performance benefit in a read-only pgbench run (-n -S -
j 64 -c 64 -T 10 -M prepared, scale 200, 6GB s_b, 8 cores, 24GB mem).
It also saves a bunch of memory per process due to
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi All,
In a *very* quick patch I tested using huge pages/MAP_HUGETLB for the mmap'ed
memory.
That gives around 9.5% performance benefit in a read-only pgbench run (-n -S -
j 64 -c 64 -T 10 -M prepared, scale 200,
There is continued interest in static analyzers (clang, coverity), and
the main problem with those is that they don't know that elog and
ereport with level = ERROR don't return, leading to lots of false
positives.
I looked in the archive; there were some attempts to fix this some time
ago. One
Hi,
Here's an answer to your review (thanks!), with no patch attached yet
even if I've been cleanup up most of what you reported. Incremental diff
is available for browsing here:
https://github.com/dimitri/postgres/compare/f99e8d93b7...8da156dc70
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
I think the issue here was that if we support two separate code paths,
we still need to do the actually unreachable /* keep compiler happy */
bits, and that compilers that know about elog not returning would
complain about unreachable code.
Yes. The
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
../../../src/include/catalog/pg_event_trigger.h:34: error: expected
specifier-qualifier-list before ‘int2’
This needs to be changed to int16 as a result of commit
b8b2e3b2deeaab19715af063fc009b7c230b2336.
Done as part of the previous work.
I wrote:
change_varattnos_of_a_node(), which is used to adjust expressions
referencing a parent relation or LIKE source relation to refer to the
child relation, ignores whole-row Vars (those with attnum zero).
...
My inclination, especially in the back branches, is to just throw error
if
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi All,
In a *very* quick patch I tested using huge pages/MAP_HUGETLB for the mmap'ed
memory.
That gives around 9.5% performance benefit in a
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of mié jun 27 08:40:58 -0400 2012:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
here's fklocks v14, which also merges to new master as there were
several other conflicts. It passes make installcheck-world now.
Recent commits broke it again, so here's a rebased v15.
I've tried to compile ODBC fdw on Win64 with all sort of compilers
without success (MingGW, gcc-win32, MS C++2005 32 and 64).
I think I'm getting too old for this so many switches, too many
dependencies.
Could a gently soul help me get back on track, possible providing
precompiled binaries that
On 29 June 2012 22:35, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
IOW I am not on board with reducing
the number of warnings in clang by increasing the number everywhere
else.
I successfully lobbied the Clang developers to remove some warnings
that came from certain sites where we use a single element
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Marco Nenciarini
marco.nenciar...@2ndquadrant.it wrote:
Hi,
following Gabriele's email regarding our previous patch on Foreign
Key Arrays[1], I am sending a subset of that patch which includes only
two array functions which will be needed in that patch:
54 matches
Mail list logo
