2012-07-14 00:36 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
For what it's worth, I would appreciate it if you would post the lock
timeout patch for the upcoming commitfest.
+1. I think it's reasonable to get the infrastructure patch in now,
but we are
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Personally, I hate this proposed nested directory structure. I would
like to have all objects in one directory.
But there is a lot of personally in this thread, of course.
Why do you hate it?
It's a bit like saying,
On lör, 2012-07-14 at 10:41 +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Personally, I hate this proposed nested directory structure. I would
like to have all objects in one directory.
But there is a lot of personally in this
c) isn't necessarily safe in production (I've crashed Linux with Fincore
in the recent past).
fincore is another soft, please provide a bugreport if you hit issue with
pgfincore, I then be able to fix it and all can benefit.
--
Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Well, of course everyone uses directories in moderation. But you might
want to take a look at the gcc source code. You'll love it. ;-)
Yes, but GCC was also created by someone who picks stuff from his bare
foot and eats
On 13.07.2012 14:35, Ryan Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:35:15PM +0900, Shigeru HANADA wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Ryan Kellyrpkell...@gmail.com wrote:
- Copying only select() part of pqSocketPoll seems not enough,
should we use poll(2) if it is supported?
I did not
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Amit kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
From: Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa [ildefonso.cama...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2012 9:36 AM
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Amit kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
From:
On 13/07/12 13:38, Jan Urbański wrote:
On 12/07/12 11:08, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 07.07.2012 00:12, Jan Urbański wrote:
So you're in favour of doing unicode - bytes by encoding with UTF-8 and
then using the server's encoding functions?
Sounds reasonable to me. The extra conversion
On Jul 13, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
I would rather get rid of this %X/%X notation. I know we have all grown
to like it, but it's always been a workaround. We're now making the
move to simplify this whole business by saying, the WAL location is an
unsigned
On 12.07.2012 23:57, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
This looks suspicious
static TimeLineID recvFileTLI = -1;
because TimeLineID is uint32. The Solaris compiler complains about the
sign mismatch.
Maybe 0 would be a better initial value?
Agreed, fixed, thanks.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
On 26.06.2012 18:06, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Fujii Masaomasao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Fujii Masao's message of mar mar 27 06:40:34 -0300 2012:
Anyway, should I add
In bug #6734 we have a complaint about a longstanding misfeature of
CREATE TABLE LIKE. Ordinarily, this command doesn't select names for
copied indexes, but leaves that to be done at runtime by DefineIndex.
But if it's copying comments, and an index of the source table has a
comment, it's forced
On lör, 2012-06-30 at 10:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
But my point was, there aren't any unused code warnings. None of the
commonly used compilers issue any. I'd be interested to know if there
is any recent C compiler supported by PostgreSQL that
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
A small sidetrack here. I've managed to set up the Solaris Studio
compiler on Linux and tried this out. It turns out these statement not
reached warnings have nothing to do with knowledge about library
functions such as abort() or exit() not
So, here's the core issue with degraded mode. I'm not mentioning this
to block any patch anyone has, but rather out of a desire to see someone
address this core problem with some clever idea I've not thought of.
The problem in a nutshell is: indeterminancy.
Assume someone implements degraded
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
I've moved this thread from performance to hackers.
The topic was poor performance when truncating lots of small tables
repeatedly on test environments with fsync=off.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Jeff Janes
Bruce,
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
If two writes happens in the middle of a file in the same second, it
seems one might be missed. Yes, I suppose the WAL does fix that during
replay, though if both servers were shut down cleanly, WAL would not be
replayed.
If you using it
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Joel Jacobson j...@trustly.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Well, of course everyone uses directories in moderation. But you might
want to take a look at the gcc source code. You'll love it. ;-)
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 09:17:22PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
Bruce,
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
If two writes happens in the middle of a file in the same second, it
seems one might be missed. Yes, I suppose the WAL does fix that during
replay, though if both servers were
Bruce,
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 09:17:22PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
So, can you explain which case you're specifically worried about?
OK. The basic problem is that I previously was not clear about how
reliant our use of rsync (without
20 matches
Mail list logo
