On Monday, September 17, 2012 07:35:06 AM Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sep 15, 2012, at 11:32 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Right, but we do a shutdown checkpoint at the end of crash recovery.
(as noted somewhere else and tackled by Simon, a
On Sunday, September 16, 2012 12:14 AM Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Amit kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 15, 2012 11:27 AM Fujii Masao wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Amit kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com
wrote:
On Thursday, September
On 15.09.2012 03:39, Andres Freund wrote:
Features:
- streaming reading/writing
- filtering
- reassembly of records
Reusing the ReadRecord infrastructure in situations where the code that wants
to do so is not tightly integrated into xlog.c is rather hard and would require
changes to rather
Hi Heikki,
On Monday, September 17, 2012 09:40:17 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 15.09.2012 03:39, Andres Freund wrote:
Features:
- streaming reading/writing
- filtering
- reassembly of records
Reusing the ReadRecord infrastructure in situations where the code that
wants to do so
On 17.09.2012 11:12, Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 09:40:17 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 15.09.2012 03:39, Andres Freund wrote:
2. We should focus on reading WAL, I don't see the point of mixing WAL
writing into this.
If you write something that filters/analyzes and
On 17 September 2012 07:44, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
So I think while that bug had the possibility of being really bad we were
pretty lucky...
Yes, agreed. The impact is not as severe as I originally thought.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
On Monday, September 17, 2012 10:30:35 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 17.09.2012 11:12, Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 09:40:17 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 15.09.2012 03:39, Andres Freund wrote:
2. We should focus on reading WAL, I don't see the point of mixing WAL
On Monday, September 17, 2012 11:07:28 AM Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 10:30:35 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 17.09.2012 11:12, Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 09:40:17 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
If you don't want the capability to
On 17.09.2012 12:07, Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 10:30:35 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
The user of the facility doesn't need to be aware of record boundaries,
that's the responsibility of the facility. I thought that's exactly the
point of generalizing this thing, to make
On 17.09.2012 13:01, Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 11:07:28 AM Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 10:30:35 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 17.09.2012 11:12, Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 09:40:17 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
If you
On Monday, September 17, 2012 12:55:47 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 17.09.2012 13:01, Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 11:07:28 AM Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 10:30:35 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 17.09.2012 11:12, Andres Freund wrote:
On
On 17.09.2012 14:42, Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 12:55:47 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 17.09.2012 13:01, Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 11:07:28 AM Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 10:30:35 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On
On Monday, September 17, 2012 01:50:33 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 17.09.2012 14:42, Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 12:55:47 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 17.09.2012 13:01, Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 11:07:28 AM Andres Freund wrote:
On
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 09/16/2012 12:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
It's annoying that the buildfarm animals running on older versions of
Solaris randomly fail with Connection refused errors, such as in
today's example:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 12:52:32 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 17.09.2012 12:07, Andres Freund wrote:
On Monday, September 17, 2012 10:30:35 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
The user of the facility doesn't need to be aware of record boundaries,
that's the responsibility of the
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Gurjeet Singh singh.gurj...@gmail.com writes:
I noticed that xlog.h uses PGDLLIMPORT, but it does not include c.h
directly or indirectly.
In general, all include files in Postgres assume that you've included
postgres.h
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Btw, I played with this some more on Saturday and I think, while definitely a
bad bug, the actual consequences aren't as bad as at least I initially feared.
Fake relcache entries are currently set in 3 scenarios during recovery:
1. removal of
Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com writes:
On 17.09.2012 13:01, Andres Freund wrote:
It seems we would need one additional callback for both approaches like:
-error(severity, format, ...)
For both to avoid having to draw in elog.c.
Yeah. Another approach would be to return the error
On 17.09.2012 17:08, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangashlinnakan...@vmware.com writes:
On 17.09.2012 13:01, Andres Freund wrote:
It seems we would need one additional callback for both approaches like:
-error(severity, format, ...)
For both to avoid having to draw in elog.c.
Yeah. Another
On Monday, September 17, 2012 04:08:01 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com writes:
On 17.09.2012 13:01, Andres Freund wrote:
It seems we would need one additional callback for both approaches like:
-error(severity, format, ...)
For both to avoid having to draw in
On Monday, September 17, 2012 04:18:28 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 17.09.2012 17:08, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangashlinnakan...@vmware.com writes:
On 17.09.2012 13:01, Andres Freund wrote:
It seems we would need one additional callback for both approaches
like: -error(severity,
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Fix bufmgr so CHECKPOINT_END_OF_RECOVERY behaves as a shutdown checkpoint.
Recovery code documents clearly that a shutdown checkpoint is executed at
end of recovery - a shutdown checkpoint WAL record is written but the
On Monday, September 17, 2012 04:59:06 PM Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Fix bufmgr so CHECKPOINT_END_OF_RECOVERY behaves as a shutdown
checkpoint. Recovery code documents clearly that a shutdown checkpoint
is executed at end of
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of dom sep 16 18:16:22 -0300 2012:
(1) The complete re-wrap of that first paragraph made it really hard
to see what the actual change to the documentation was. I would
rather change it like this and have a separate patch to re-wrap the
paragraph (with
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message:
(1) The complete re-wrap of that first paragraph made it really
hard to see what the actual change to the documentation was. I
would rather change it like this and have a separate patch to
re-wrap the
On 17 September 2012 15:59, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Fix bufmgr so CHECKPOINT_END_OF_RECOVERY behaves as a shutdown checkpoint.
Recovery code documents clearly that a shutdown checkpoint is executed at
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 01:03:37PM +0800, Rural Hunter wrote:
As you can see, we look at the existing TOAST usage and force the new
cluster to match. As I remember we replay the DROP COLUMN in binary
upgrade mode so the new cluster always matches the old cluster's TOAST
usage. I certainly
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 16:16 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
I'm attaching an alternative proposal, with changes for the following
reasons:
Looks good to me, aside from not wrapping the text.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I just noted during investigating of the impact of the fakerelcache bug that
contrary to whats claimed at several places END_OF_RECOVERY checkpoints do
*not* behave the same way CHECKPOINT_IS_SHUTDOWN ones do. Which
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 15:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Maybe we're talking past each other. What I thought you meant was
adding this #define unconditionally, without any awareness of what it
might do on particular platforms. If you are thinking of adding it
only on platforms where it is
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 15:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Maybe we're talking past each other. What I thought you meant was
adding this #define unconditionally, without any awareness of what it
might do on particular platforms. If you are thinking of adding
31 matches
Mail list logo
