2012/10/21 Albert Cervera i Areny :
> A Dimecres, 17 d'octubre de 2012 19:13:47, Merlin Moncure va escriure:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Peter Geoghegan
>> wrote:
>
>> > On 17 October 2012 14:53, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
>> >> Is that defined in the standard?
>
>> >
>
>> > RETURNING isn'
A Dimecres, 17 d'octubre de 2012 19:13:47, Merlin Moncure va escriure:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Peter Geoghegan
wrote:
> > On 17 October 2012 14:53, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> >> Is that defined in the standard?
> >
> > RETURNING isn't even defined in the standard.
>
> Right: Point bein
On Sat, 2012-10-20 at 14:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > It looks like I broke this in commit
> > 4317e0246c645f60c39e6572644cff1cb03b4c65, because I removed this from
> > _tocEntryRequired():
>
> > - /* Ignore DATABASE entry unless we should create it */
> > - if (!ropt->createDB &&
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen
wrote:
> For these reasons, I can imagine using "watch -n2 psql -c …", but not
> \watch in its present form. (Of course, I doubt anyone would be enthused
> about a proposal to link ncurses into psql, but that's another matter.)
A good point.
P
I think that we're both going to be busy next week, since we're both
attending pgconf.eu. For that reason, I would like to spend some time
tomorrow to get something in shape, that I can mark "ready for
committer". I'd like to get this patch committed during this
commitfest. You are welcome to do th
I wrote:
> It looks like I broke this in commit
> 4317e0246c645f60c39e6572644cff1cb03b4c65, because I removed this from
> _tocEntryRequired():
> - /* Ignore DATABASE entry unless we should create it */
> - if (!ropt->createDB && strcmp(te->desc, "DATABASE") == 0)
> - return 0;
2012/10/11 Etsuro Fujita :
> Hi Hanada-san,
>
>> Please examine attached v2 patch (note that is should be applied onto
>> latest dblink_fdw_validator patch).
>
> I've reviewed your patch quickly. I noticed that the patch has been created
> in
> a slightly different way from the guidelines:
> http
Robert Haas writes:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
>> Hm, but the bug is said to happen only in 9.2, so if we don't backpatch
>> we would leave 9.2 alone exhibiting this behavior.
> Oh, yeah. I missed that. But then shouldn't we start by identifying
> which commit
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Amit kapila wrote:
>
>> Robert wrote an accounting patch a while ago that tallied how often a
>> buffer was cleaned but then reclaimed for the same page before being
>> evicted. But now I can't find it. If you can find that thread, there
>> might be some benchma
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Amit kapila wrote:
> On Thursday, September 06, 2012 2:38 PM Amit kapila wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 6:55 PM Amit kapila wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:42 AM Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Amit kapila wrote:
This pa
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Kevin, you're good to go on the SSI patch, or I'll apply next week
> if you don't. Thanks for that.
There were some hunks failing because of minor improvements to the
comments you applied, so attached is a version with trivial
adjustments for that. Will apply tomorrow if ther
On 20 October 2012 07:43, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2012-10-15 10:28:17 -0400, robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> > Is there any concise description that applies? […]
>>
>> I don't think there is. I think we need to replace those counters
>> with something better. The status quo is quite biz
On 20 October 2012 06:57, David Lee wrote:
> I was trying to create foreign key constraints on a sub-column of a
> composite-type column, but couldn't find a way to do it. After asking around
> on IRC, it seems like this isn't supported in PostgreSQL.
>
> I wanted to do something like:
>
>
2012/10/19 Robert Haas :
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Shigeru HANADA
> wrote:
>> However, I'm not sure where that leaves us with respect to the original
>> goal of getting rid of use of that function name. Thoughts?
>>
>> Sorry, I had misunderstood the problem :-(. In my proposal, postgres
At 2012-10-19 17:15:27 -0700, w...@heroku.com wrote:
>
> will=# \watch select now();
> Watch every 2s Fri Oct 19 17:09:23 2012
>
> now
> ---
> 2012-10-19 17:09:23.743176-07
> (1 row)
The patch looks OK at first glance, and I can confirm that it works as
15 matches
Mail list logo