On 17 May 2013 21:46, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Qi Huang huangq...@outlook.com wrote:
Dear hackers
Sorry for not replying the patch review. I didn't see the review until
recently as my mail box is full of Postgres mails and I didn't
Do we want to run pgindent soon?
--
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make
Hi,
Please find attached a patch to take code-coverage of CREATE OPERATOR
(src/backend/commands/operatorcmds.c) from 56% to 91%.
Any and all feedback is welcome.
--
Robins Tharakan
regress_createoperator.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
A PostgreSQL user recently reported on pgsql-admin about an issue:
when he changed wal_level from 'minimal' to 'hot_standby', the WAL
segment sequence rewound, that is, it started using old names. A
snippet of his ls -lrt pg_xlog:
-rw--- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 May 21 12:13
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
[ MVCC catalog access seems to be pretty cheap ]
In discussions today, Tom Lane suggested testing the time to start up
a backend and run a simple query such as SELECT 2+2 in the absence
of a relcache file.
I did this and
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Do we want to run pgindent soon?
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
On 2013-05-22 22:51:13 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
In discussions today, Tom Lane suggested testing the time to start up
a backend and run a simple query such as SELECT 2+2 in the absence
of a relcache file.
I did this and can't measure any overhead as a result of MVCC catalog
access. I tried
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
It shouldn't be difficult to restrict the set of backends that have to
be signaled to those that have the relation open. You could have a
special kind of catchup signal that means catch yourself up, but
don't
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-05-22 22:51:13 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
In discussions today, Tom Lane suggested testing the time to start up
a backend and run a simple query such as SELECT 2+2 in the absence
of a relcache file.
I did
On 2013-05-22 23:05:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 2013-05-22 22:51:13 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
In discussions today, Tom Lane suggested testing the time to start up
a backend and run a simple query such as
10 matches
Mail list logo