Re: [HACKERS] 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering)

2014-12-11 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > So far, I haven't seen any features for 9.5 which would delay a more > timely release the way we did for 9.4. Anybody know of a bombshell > someone's going to drop on us for CF5? > I had wondered about that myself. What about jsquery? Is th

Re: [HACKERS] Casting issues with domains

2014-12-11 Thread Thomas Reiss
Le 11/12/2014 00:46, Tom Lane a écrit : > Kevin Grittner writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> As far as that goes, I think the OP was unhappy about the performance >>> of the information_schema views, which in our implementation do exactly >>> that so that the exposed types of the view columns conform

Re: [HACKERS] WRITE_UINT_FIELD used where WRITE_OID_FIELD likely intended

2014-12-11 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 12/11/2014 05:57 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Mark Dilger wrote: At line 1787 of outfuncs.c, the line: WRITE_UINT_FIELD(reltablespace) should probably say WRITE_OID_FIELD(reltablespace) since that variable is of type Oid, not uint32. Gran

<    1   2