On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
I'm a bit confused though, because I've noticed various other FOSS projects
adopting lz4 over the past few years and I'm yet to find a project voicing
the same concerns about patents. So either they're reckless or we're
excessively paranoid.
Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com writes:
If we're going to magically create the schema (which at least for a
fully non-relocatable extension is fine), then I think we should also
mark the schema as being part of the extension.
If we do that, what happens to other objects that were added to
After a large bulk load aborted near the end, I decided to vacuum the main
table so as to not leave a huge chunk of free space in the middle of it,
before re-running the bulk load. This vacuum took a frustratingly long
time, as the backwards scan over the table to truncate the space did not
Hi,
On 2015-04-19 22:51:53 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
The reason why I'm asking about this is the multivariate statistics patch -
while optimizing the planning overhead, I realized that considerable amount
of time is spent decompressing the statistics (serialized as bytea), and
using an
* Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
I'm a bit confused though, because I've noticed various other FOSS projects
adopting lz4 over the past few years and I'm yet to find a project voicing
the same concerns about patents.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
Visibly that's not the case for this test case, the timing issues that
we saw happened not because of the standby not catching up, but
because of the promotion not taking effect in a timely fashion. And
that's as well something I saw on
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Tomas Vondra
tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi all,
attached is v4 of the patch implementing adaptive ndistinct estimator.
Hi Tomas,
I have a case here where the adaptive
On 4/19/15 9:09 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
I did literally the simplest thing I could think of as a proof of
concept patch, to see if it would actually fix things. I just jumped
back a certain number of blocks occasionally and prefetched them
forward, then resumed the regular backward scan. The
