On 01/26/2015 05:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2015-01-26 14:02 GMT+01:00 Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to:
I am thinking, so solution
/* if we are doing RAISE, don't report its location */
if (estate-err_text == raise_skip_msg)
return;
On 07/07/2015 04:15 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Fujii Masao (masao.fu...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
+ the compression ratio of a full page image gives a hint of what is
+ the existing data of this page.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi,
I am getting tired installing manually required extensions manually. I was
wondering if we might want to add option to CREATE SEQUENCE that would allow
automatic creation of the extensions required by the extension
* Fujii Masao (masao.fu...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com
-Original Message-
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:j...@agliodbs.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 7. Juli 2015 02:04
On 07/06/2015 12:20 AM, Marc Mamin wrote:
There seems to be no fence against useless BRIN indexes that
would allow a fallback on a table scan.
But the time overhead remind
On 2015-07-07 06:41:55 -0700, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
There seems to be a misplaced not operator ! in that if statement, as
well. That sucks :( The MacOS gcc binary is actually clang, and its output
is too noisy [1], which is probably why I might have missed warning if any.
Which version of
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
On 01/26/2015 05:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2015-01-26 14:02 GMT+01:00 Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to:
I am thinking, so solution
/* if we are doing RAISE, don't report
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-22 18:34 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Oleksandr Shulgin oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de writes:
I think this is a bit over-engineered (apart from the fact that
processSQLNamePattern is also used
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2015-07-07 16:17:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
2) Potential pointer dereference in plperl.c, fixed by 0002 (sent
previously here =
CAB7nPqRBCWAXTLw0yBR=bk94cryxu8twvxgyyoxautw08ok...@mail.gmail.com).
This is
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
Hmm. I think it'd be better to put the tables_fk extension into
src/test/modules, and the test case under src/test/tables_fk/t/. I'm
inclined to think of this as a test case for an extension that contains a
table, which
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2015-07-04 13:45, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
Well for indexes you don't really need to add the new AT command, as
IndexStmt has char *idxcomment which it will
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com wrote:
That explains why the first example works while the second does not.
I'm not sure how hard it would be to fix that, but it appears that
that is where we should focus.
Wouldn't it be fine if we drop some of the functions
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im wrote:
log_min_messages acts as a single gate for everything headed for the
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you for bug report, and comments.
Fixed version is attached, and source code comment is also updated.
Please review it.
I
So I don't understand why you have two separate calls to visibilitymap_clear()
Surely the logic should be to clear both bits at the same time?
Yes, you're right. all-frozen bit should be cleared at the same time
as clearing all-visible bit.
1. Both bits unset ~(VISIBILITYMAP_ALL_VISIBLE |
On 2015-07-07 10:17:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I would s/pid/process ID/ in the docs. PID is not a particularly
user-friendly term, and it's even less so if you fail to upper-case it.
We have both pid and PID in a bunch of places in the docs, and pid in
the ones that seem more likely to be
* Fujii Masao (masao.fu...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
I'm not following. If we don't want the information to be available to
everyone then we need to limit it, and right now the only way to do that
is to restrict it to
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:44 PM, David Christensen da...@endpoint.com wrote:
On Jul 7, 2015, at 3:53 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:11 AM, David Christensen da...@endpoint.com
On 07/07/2015 04:56 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
On 01/26/2015 05:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2015-01-26 14:02 GMT+01:00 Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to:
I am thinking, so solution
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
