On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> [condition-variable-v1.patch]
>
> Don't you need to set proc->cvSleeping = false in ConditionVariableSignal?
I poked at this a
On 2016-08-14 21:04:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2016-08-07 14:46:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Robert Haas writes:
> >>> I think the whole idea of a fast temporary table is that there are no
> >>> catalog entries. If there
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2016-08-07 14:46:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> I think the whole idea of a fast temporary table is that there are no
>>> catalog entries. If there are no catalog entries, then dependencies
>>> are not
On 2016-08-07 14:46:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > I think the whole idea of a fast temporary table is that there are no
> > catalog entries. If there are no catalog entries, then dependencies
> > are not visible. If there ARE catalog entries, to what
I recently had a client contact me thinking that a CREATE MATERIALIZED
VIEW had somehow managed to keep running in the background after being
^C'd in psql. Turns out this confusion was because their monitoring
eventually complained about the still open (but now aborted)
transaction. The user
På søndag 07. august 2016 kl. 18:35:56, skrev Tom Lane >:
Dean Rasheed writes:
> On 5 August 2016 at 21:48, Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK, thanks. What shall we do about Andreas' request to back-patch this?
I did a trial run following the current pgindent README procedure, and
noticed that the perltidy step left me with a pile of '.bak' files
littering the entire tree. This seems like a pretty bad idea because
a naive "git add ." would have committed them. It's evidently because
Hello Postgres Hackers!
I sent this already a few hours ago but it got blocked because I had not
yet joined the mailing list. Trying again, sorry for any redundancy or
confusion!
This is to fix an issue that came up for me when running initdb.
At the end of a successful initdb it says:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 3 November 2015 at 15:23, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Simon Riggs
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 October 2015 at 13:31, Jeff Janes
Aravind Kumar writes:
> when I do
> select 1.0e+1001::numeric;
> I get
> invalid input syntax for type numeric: "1.0e+1001"
> Postgresql documentation tells me that numeric data type has an upper
> limit of 131072 digits before decimal point.
You can successfully do
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, failed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:tested, passed
Hi hackers!
I've read the patch and here is my code review.
Hello Postgres Team!
This is to fix an issue that came up for me when running initdb.
At the end of a successful initdb it says:
Success. You can now start the database server using:
pg_ctl -D /some/path/to/data -l logfile start
but this command did not work for me because my data
Hi Thomas,
Barriers are really very simple and convenient mechanism for process
synchronization.
But it is actually a special case of semaphores: having semaphore primitive it
is trivial to implement a barrier.
We have semaphores in Postgres, but ... them can not be used by extensions:
there
13 matches
Mail list logo