On 15 October 2017 at 06:49, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:49 PM, David Rowley
> wrote:
>> tps = 8282.481310 (including connections establishing)
>> tps = 8282.750821 (excluding connections establishing)
>
> vs.
>
>> tps = 8520.822410 (including connections establishing)
>> tps =
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:13 PM, David Rowley
wrote:
>
> I looked over the patch and saw this:
>
> @@ -1800,6 +1827,9 @@ cost_merge_append(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root,
> */
> run_cost += cpu_operator_cost * tuples;
>
> + /* Add MergeAppend node overhead like we do it for the Append node */
On 2017/10/14 4:32, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
>> The relkind check in DefineIndex has grown into an ugly rats nest of
>> 'if' statements. I propose to change it into a switch, as per the
>> attached.
>
> wfm
+1
Thanks,
Amit
--
Sent via p
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:15 AM, Gourav Kumar wrote:
> Why does have_relevant_joinclause() and have_relevant_eclass_joinclause()
> return true for all possible joins for the query given below.
> Even when they have no join predicate between them.
> e.g. join between ss1 & ws3, ss2 & ws3 etc.
>
Th
Hi Amit.
On 2017/10/04 22:51, Amit Khandekar wrote:
> Main patch :
> update-partition-key_v20.patch
Guess you're already working on it but the patch needs a rebase. A couple
of hunks in the patch to execMain.c and nodeModifyTable.c fail.
Meanwhile a few comments:
+void
+pull_child_partition_co
On 13 October 2017 at 08:50, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -Hackers,
>
> I had a long call with a firm developing front end proxy/cache/HA for
> Postgres today. Essentially the software is a replacement for PGPool in
> entirety but also supports analytics etc... When I was asking them about
> pain poin
>> >> test=# CREATE VIEW v3 AS SELECT count(*) FROM v1;
>> >> CREATE VIEW
>> >> test=# BEGIN;
>> >> BEGIN
>> >> test=# LOCK TABLE v3;
>> >> ERROR: cannot lock view "v3"
>> >> DETAIL: Views that return aggregate functions are not automatically
>> >> updatable.
>> >
>> > It would be nice if the m
On 2017/10/13 22:58, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Amit Langote
> wrote:
>
>> On 2017/10/05 22:28, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>> In the 'ftp' listing, v10 appears at the bottom:
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/
>>>
>>> With all the other v10* directories at the to
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 08:56:56PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:57:32PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > Also notice the vacuum process was interrupted, same as yesterday (think
> > > goodness for full logs). Our INSERT script is using python
> > > multiprocessing.pool
2017-08-21 6:25 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule :
>
>
>> xpath-bugfix.patch affected only xml values containing an xml declaration
>> with
>> "encoding" attribute. In UTF8 databases, this latest proposal
>> (xpath-parsing-error-fix.patch) is equivalent to xpath-bugfix.patch. In
>> non-UTF8 databases, xp
On 10/14/2017 11:47 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think it's perfectly sensible to view those 2 bits as making up a
>> 2-bit field with 4 states rather than displaying each bit
>> individually, but you obviously disagree. Fair enough.>
> I
Hi,
On 10/15/2017 03:56 AM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:57:32PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
...
>> It's a bit difficult to guess what went wrong from this backtrace. For
>> me gdb typically prints a bunch of lines immediately before the frames,
>> explaining what went wrong -
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> But I see very
> little case for allowing CTEs to capture such references, because surely
> we are never going to allow that to do anything useful, and we have
> several years of precedent now that they don't capture.
For what it's worth, SQL Se
Hello!
> 9 окт. 2017 г., в 10:23, Andrey Borodin написал(а):
>
> Thanks, Stephen, this actually pointed what to look for
> VM is WAL-logged [0]
> FSM is not [1]
>
> [0]
> https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/113b0045e20d40f726a0a30e33214455e4f1385e/src/backend/access/heap/visibilitymap.c
There is still some activities regarding this question like
https://blogs.sap.com/2017/05/08/replicate-abap-database-table-definition-to-postgresql/
Maybe PG or EDB (with the Oracle compatibility layer) would have been better
strategic choice for SAP to conter ORACLE ;o)
--
Sent from: http://w
2017-10-02 12:22 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <
horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>:
> Hi, thanks for the new patch.
>
> # The patch is missing xpath_parser.h. That of the first patch was usable.
>
> At Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:59:41 +0200, Pavel Stehule
> wrote in mail.gmail.com>
> > Hi
> >
> > now xpat
16 matches
Mail list logo
