Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level.

2015-08-19 Thread ''Victor Wagner *EXTERN*' *EXTERN*' *EXTERN*
On 2015.08.19 at 15:35:17 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > > I think we do need some way of saying that a readonly connection is OK. So I had such thing in my propsal (boolean parameter readonly). But haven't yet checked if it is compatible with jdbc syntax. > the default would be to connect to eac

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level.

2015-08-19 Thread ''Victor Wagner *EXTERN*' *EXTERN*'
On 2015.08.19 at 07:15:30 +, Albe Laurenz wrote: > > Idea is that we don't need any extra administration actions such as IP > > migration to do it. Clients have list of alternate servers and discover > > which one to work with by trial and error. > > Yes, but that will only work reliably if t