On 2017-01-24 09:20, Shruti Rawal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are doing an assessment for for migrating our Perl applications to Windows
> 2016 server.
> I am trying to install PostgreSQL 8.2 version on my Windows server 2016. But
> it is giving me following error:
> Malformed permissions property: 'lan
On 2015-08-25 08:57, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 08/25/2015 08:30 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2015-08-25 08:29:18 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> needs a buildfarm animal. If we had one we'd presumably have caught this
> >> much earlier.
> > On the other hand, we dropped alpha support in 9.5,
On 2015-05-13 18:16, Christopher Browne wrote:
> On 13 May 2015 at 17:55, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > "Aaron W. Swenson" writes:
> > > Trying to build HEAD and ran into this issue building the docs:
> > > openjade:logicaldecoding.sgml:575:62:Q: length
flags we (you) pass to openjade, but
couldn't make it override NAMELEN.
So, I've attached a patch that'll fix it.
From 231b317e2eda1f63ff3f5485105c4e8ac1f36146 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Aaron W. Swenson"
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 15:42:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix tok
nge.
make && make check all succeeded without intervention.
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529680
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
PostgreSQL Herd Bull
Email : titanof...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07 A49C 0E31 5713 AA03 D1BB FDA0
GnuPG
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:54:06PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 1/12/13 3:30 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> > The Linux Standard Base Core Specification 3.1 says this should return
> > '3'. [1]
> >
> > [1]
> > http://refspecs.freestandards.org/
string output. Maybe each different exit reason should have a
> > unique exit code, whatever my logic and approach to solving this
> > problem be?
>
> That doesn't seem like a bad idea. Got a patch?
>
The Linux Standard Base Core Specification 3.1 says this should return
&#
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:25:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Aaron W. Swenson" writes:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 08:12:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Sorry about going off on a theological tangent. The important question
> >> at this point is, can anybo
not we'll have to pull it out, whether or not it would be a good
> thing to have on Debian.
>
> regards, tom lane
I can give it a go.
At any rate, I'll have to fix the problem before I
can release the package to the Portage tree, even if that means I remo
k it should be
> back-patched all the way.
>
> Best,
>
> David
That's my vote, too. It's preventing users of all versions from compiling
against ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.20.0.
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux
Developer, Proxy Committer
Email: titanof...@gentoo.org
GnuP
e backported, too, frankly. DId I miss it?
> > Nah, probably should add it to the next commit fest so it does not get
> > forgotten.
> >
>
> committed.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
Has this been backpatched as well?
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
Email: titanof...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07 A49C 0E31 5713 AA03 D1BB FDA0
GnuPG ID : D1BBFDA0
pgpOvprJOI60g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
'm not too terribly interested in pg_config
outputting the directory location.
We inform users at the end of every install where the default location
is. Further, all of the packages we maintain build against the sources so
the packages automatically know where the socket directory is locate
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 07:59:07PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Mr. Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> > > With the patch I am going to commit, you will not need to use one of the
> > > -D flags because pg_ctl will find the data directory location; you will
> > > just spe
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 07:20:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Mr. Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 10:44:38AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > On m?n, 2011-10-03 at
sql-9.1/bin/pg_ctl start -w \
-t 60 -s -D /var/lib/postgresql/9.1/data/ \
-o '-D /etc/postgresql-9.1/ \
--data-directory=/var/lib/postgresql/9.1/data/ \
--silent-mode=true'"
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
Email: titanof...@
se, I've mostly paralleled initscript functionality with
the functionality of pg_ctl. Multiple initscripts are installed
side-by-side to control multiple major versions.
1. http://dev.gentoo.org/~titanofold/
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
Email: titanof...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C0
chose to stick with pg_ctl over
rolling my own precisely because of that. pg_ctl does all sorts of fancy
things that would have taken me a much longer time than figuring out a way
to allow a configuration-only directory and a data-only directory.
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
Em
TIMEOUT='60'
WAIT_FOR_STOP='-w'
NICE_TIMEOUT='60'
DATA_DIR='/var/lib/postgresql/9.0/data'
PGDATA='/etc/postgresql-9.0'
PGOPTS=''
We don't use 'pg_ctl restart', instead we stop and then start the
server. So, I don't have an answer for that. I'd imagine passing '-D
${DATA_DIR}' would do the trick there as well.
Of course, simplifying this a bit would be welcome.
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
Email: titanof...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07 A49C 0E31 5713 AA03 D1BB FDA0
GnuPG ID : D1BBFDA0
pgpLbW9GnlOgM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
g to say. I'd view this as bringing the behavior of pg_upgrade
to a consistent state with postgres. I vote for it being backpatched to
9.0 even. For whatever my vote is worth.
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Pseudonym: TitanOfOld
Gentoo Developer
pgpRbF13InZSg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ggestion. We do the same on Gentoo, as a
default anyway. (Users can pick their own locations for the configuration files
and data directories.) It would simplify the upgrade process by eliminating two
to four steps. (Symlink/copy configuration files in /etc/postgresql-${SLOT}
to /var/lib/postgresql-${S
takes advantage of pg_ctl for its initscript
actions.
Sincerely,
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
[1]
http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.1/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/24/2010 02:32 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> Also, unless Gentoo actually strips the man-page and "--help" page (which I
> do
> seriously doubt), I do not see the "-X" option in the documentation.
>
> --
> Joost
>
Delayed response: No, we do
As a common user -- probably a bit more than that now -- I'd have to say my
reaction to '\d' instead of 'SHOW DATABASES;' was more of a "meh" moment for
me. Furthermore, '\d' is much quick to type than 'SHOW DATABASES;', and much
less likely to suffer typos.
As for '\d' not being memorable: It
On Sunday 27 June 2010 10:26:48 you wrote:
> "Aaron W. Swenson" writes:
> > I have a short list of modules that have been built without respecting my
> > LDFLAGS and/or LDFLAGS_SL.
>
> It's difficult to comment on this since you haven't told us what flag
around in the documentation and the source code, but have found
nothing enlightening.
Is there a way to force them to be built with my LDFLAGS? Is it a bad idea? If
so, why?
Sincerely,
Aaron W. Swenson
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
25 matches
Mail list logo
