On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:32:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The solution is to either revert to the 8.1.1 code (my recommendation)
> > or check for ngetaddrinfo. The latter is a crude hack though.
>
> Hm, I think both of
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:56:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) will not detect getaddrinfo() on Tru64
> > UNIX because getaddrinfo is not in libc.
>
> Hmm, where is it then?
getaddrinfo
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:02:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) won't correctly detect getaddrinfo on
> > Tru64 UNIX because the function doesn't exist under that name in libc.
>
> We
nfo' function.])],
[AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
AC_LIBOBJ(getaddrinfo)])
So, what's the best way to merge the two? If getaddrinfo() is borked
on Windows, how about AC_TRY_RUN to test it out?
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
---(end of broadcast)-
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 05:14:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Does the patch below look like the correct fix to CVE-2006-0553 if
> > running 8.1.1?
>
> Why in the world would you not install 8.1.3 instead? Or are you hoping
&
Does the patch below look like the correct fix to CVE-2006-0553 if
running 8.1.1? I just scanned cvs log from the 8.1 branch, looking for
CVE-2006-0553 and picked out the diffs.
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-- snip snip
Index: src/backend/commands/variable.c
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 06:34:38PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 05:59:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Perhaps a more relevant question is why ecpg/preproc is including
> >> that header.
>
> &g
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 05:59:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The problem is that /usr/include/arpa/nameser_compat.h defines a
> > struct named HEADER. This conflicts with the use of preproc.y in
> > src/interfaces/ecpg/pre
valid
declarator. (declarator)
} HEADER;
--^
The problem is that /usr/include/arpa/nameser_compat.h defines a
struct named HEADER. This conflicts with the use of preproc.y in
src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.y.
What should it be renamed to?
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROT
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:39:01PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> * Running 'autoconf' is now very slow. Too bad.
But rerunning autoconf should be fast, thanks to autom4te.cache.
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
---(end of broadcast)--
10 matches
Mail list logo
