Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL roadmap for 8.2 and beyond.

2005-11-14 Thread Aly Dharshi
Would the PG Dev group be working on update-able views for 8.2 ? I know that there is a work-around using rules, the SAMS book does claim that 8.0 has readonly views. I don't think that this has changed in 8.1 no ? Cheers, Aly. Bruce Momjian wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gavin Sherry:

Re: [HACKERS] DTrace?

2005-11-07 Thread Aly Dharshi
From what I understand DTrace is rather tough to use. Secondly it will provide Solaris only information, so if you are suggesting helpfulness for just Solaris, then yes it would be. I don't think that DTrace is available for Solaris 8 and 9, the company I work for is still on 8 with possibly som

Re: [HACKERS] postgresql clustering

2005-09-21 Thread Aly Dharshi
I was thinking to use this opportunity to start implementing the clustering over postgresql using any of the above packages. What do you think? Let a thousand schools of thought content. Let a hundred flowers bloom. Cheers, D -- Aly Dharshi [EMAIL PROTECTED] "A good speech is

Re: [HACKERS] initdb profiles

2005-09-08 Thread aly . dharshi
Hello All, Please allow me to put a disclaimer, I am no serious PG hacker, but would it be possible to allow for a simple config script to be run (which would work even via /etc/init.d) which could be used to generate a config file for initdb, which initdb could read and do its thing ? Thi

Re: [HACKERS] Version number in psql banner

2005-09-01 Thread aly . dharshi
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Darcy Buskermolen wrote: Yes I've seen the same frustration from users, I think the banner should say something along the lines of "psql client version foo connected to server bar version sfoo" I second this, I think that something like "psl client version 8.03 connected