.2ndquadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training Services
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Ashutosh,
Sorry for leaving the thread.
2015-07-20 16:09 GMT+09:00 Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com
:
In find_user_mapping(), if the first cache search returns a valid tuple,
it
is checked
Joins
Still needs to be reviewed. Any volunteers?
* checkpoint continuous flushing
Per discussion on that thread, let's just do the sorting part now. Needs
some cleanup, but it's almost there.
- Heikki
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
With that notion of backend, to fix the original problem I reported,
PostmasterMarkPIDForWorkerNotify() should also look
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:00 PM, David Rowley david.row...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 4 August 2015 at 21:56, Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com
wrote:
This looks like one example of general problem of finding optimal order
for SQL operations. Consider a query defined as sql_op1
.2ndquadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
I'm not hung up on the table-level attribute, but I think having a
server-level attribute rather than a global GUC is a good idea
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
A user may set atomic_foreign_transaction to ON to guarantee atomicity,
IOW
it throws error when atomicity can not be guaranteed
and outer nodes in
parallel?
Sorry for the rant, but I just feel like we're painting ourselves into a
corner by parallel enabling the executor node by node.
Apologies if I've completely misunderstood things.
+1, well articulated.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
,
will not complain as it sees A1, but in case X rolls back, we may have B1
referencing nothing.
Am I missing something?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
-cases.
Requesting for everyone's opinion regarding this based on which we can
proceed to enhance/tune/re-write our design.
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Kumar Rajeev Rastogi *
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2
than database-connection.
I'm less sure what to do with workers that have not even got shmem
access.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
diff --git
the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database
: http://www.timbira.com.br
Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
PostmasterMarkPIDForWorkerNotify() to scan the
list of other background workers as well)?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
find any problem.
--
Shigeru HANADA
shigeru.han...@gmail.com
--
Shigeru HANADA
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
of relations (and hence
paths) we examine during planning.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Shigeru HANADA shigeru.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Ashutosh,
Thanks for the review.
2015/04/22 19:28、Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com のメール：
Tests
---
1.The postgres_fdw test is re/setting enable_mergejoin at various
places. The goal
of
results i.e. size of row * number of rows to understand the dynamics.
Thanks.
--Hitesh
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
think we will have complex hook signature, it won't
remain as simple as hook (root, joinrel).
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
really glad this is going in! Thanks to to Shigeru Hanada and
Etsuro Fujita for working on this, to you (Tom) for putting in the
time to get it committed, and of course to the reviewers Ashutosh
Bapat and Kyotaro Horiguchi for their time and effort.
In a way, I believe we can think
-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
What I'm imagining instead is that when there's more than one
target relation, we produce output
.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
that information, within
the FDW code.
--
Shigeru HANADA
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres
to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
pgfdw_join.sql
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
this
route, so ignore the comment, in that case.
Apart from this, I do not have any comments here.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
On 2015/03/09 16:02, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
I tried reproducing the issue with the steps summarised.
Thanks
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
On 2015/03/11 17:37, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
Now I can reproduce the problem.
Sanity
Patch compiles cleanly and make check passes. The tests in file_fdw and
postgres_fdw contrib modules pass
?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Ashutosh Bapat
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 7:26 PM
To: Kaigai Kouhei(海外 浩平)
Cc: Shigeru Hanada; Robert Haas; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Join push-down support for foreign tables
Hi Kaigai-san, Hanada-san,
Attached
Message-
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Shigeru Hanada
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 10:00 PM
To: Ashutosh Bapat
Cc: Kaigai Kouhei(海外 浩平); Robert Haas; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Join push-down
KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:41 PM, David Rowley dgrow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 March 2015 at 19:01, Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com
wrote:
Postgres-XC solved this question by creating a plan with two Agg/Group
nodes, one for combining transitioned result and one for creating
. I'll recheck that part.
--
Shigeru HANADA
--
Shigeru HANADA
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
Added to 2015-06 commitfest to attract some reviews and comments.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Hi All,
Here are the steps and infrastructure for achieving atomic commits across
multiple foreign servers. I have tried to address most
the
entries within the core. I am willing to go the stricter but more intrusive
route if the others also think that way. Otherwise, the current approach is
less intrusive and I am fine with that too.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
diff --git
Well let's see what others think. Also, we might want to separate that
information on result relations heading probably.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
Hi Ashutosh,
Thank you for the review!
On 2015/02/03 15:32, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
I
?id=1386
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
handles EXPLAIN well, but I didn't see any specific code for PREPARE.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
normal processing and recovery looks very useful.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com
wrote:
Also, as previously mentioned, it must behave in some reasonable
way if a database
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
While looking at the patch for supporting inheritance on foreign tables,
I
noticed that if a transaction makes changes to more than two foreign
servers the current
to just speak PostgreSQL and be happy that its
commits no longer end up half-done.)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
wrote:
On 1/6/15, 1:00 AM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
Even checking whether the output of the function is in the right order or
not, has its cost. I am suggesting that we can eliminate this cost as well.
For example, PostgreSQL does not check whether a function is really
immutable
see why would my patch cause inconsistencies. It can cause dangling
PREPAREd transactions and I have already acknowledged that fact.
Am I missing something?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
this cost as well.
For example, PostgreSQL does not check whether a function is really
immutable or not.
Regards,
Atri
--
Regards,
Atri
*l'apprenant*
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
the transaction manager.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
diff --git a/contrib/postgres_fdw/connection.c b/contrib/postgres_fdw/connection.c
index 116be7d..9492f14 100644
--- a/contrib/postgres_fdw/connection.c
+++ b/contrib/postgres_fdw/connection.c
list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
I marked this as ready for committer.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
Hi Ashutosh,
Thanks for the review!
(2014/12/10 14:47), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
We haven't heard anything from Horiguchi-san and Hanada-san for almost a
week. So, I am
), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/11/17 17:55), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
Here are my review comments for patch fdw-inh-3.patch.
Tests
---
1
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:00:14AM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/12/03 19:35), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:29 AM
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/11/28 18:14), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Apart from the above, I noticed that the patch
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/11/28 18:14), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/12/03 19:35), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
This is not exactly extension of non-inheritance
Sorry, here's the script.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/12/03 19:35), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Etsuro Fujita
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/11/17 17:55), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
Here are my review comments for patch fdw-inh-3.patch.
Thanks for the review!
Tests
---
1. It seems like you have copied from testcase inherit.sql
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp writes:
(2014/11/19 18:21), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
Ok. I added that comment to the commitfest and changed the status to
ready for commiter.
Many thanks!
I committed
Ok. I added that comment to the commitfest and changed the status to ready
for commiter.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/11/19 15:56), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/11/12 20:04), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
I reviewed fdw-chk-3 patch. Here are my comments
Thanks for the review!
Tests
---
1. The tests added in file_fdw module look good. We should add tests
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/11/18 18:27), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/11/17 19:36), Ashutosh Bapat wrote
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/11/19 14:58), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/11/18 18:27), Ashutosh Bapat wrote
, it will good, if we add that to regression in postgres_fdw.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Hi Fujita-san,
Here are my comments about the patch fscan_reltargetlist.patch
Sanity
Patch applies and compiles cleanly.
Regressions in test
changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
Hi Ashutosh,
Thanks for the review!
(2014/11/13 15:23), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
I tried to apply fdw-inh-3.patch on the latest head from master branch.
It failed to apply using both patch and git apply
://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1599
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/08/21 13:21), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Hi Ashutish,
I am sorry that I mistook
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
Hi Ashutish,
(2014/08/14 22:30), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/08/08 18:51), Etsuro
[min_attr ..
max_attr] */
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
parallel costs
in plan/path structs, and single-row mode for postgres_fdw. I
hope it will go towards anything.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
test, that feels a bit like the tail wagging the dog to me,
especially as I do hope that some day we'll figure out a way to use a
better compression algorithm than pglz.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database
.
Is there any suggestions or opinions?
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
and if
eof_reached is false.
2096 /* Must be EOF if we didn't get as many tuples as we asked
for. */
2097 fsstate-eof_reached = (numrows fetch_size);
2098
2099 PQclear(res);
2100 res = NULL;
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba
infrastructure we've been
talking about where Postgres would know what the partitioning key is
and the order and range of the partitions so it can directly generate
the matching subjoins in less than n^2 time.
--
greg
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I doubt it. The extra code isn't the problem so much, it's the extra
planning cycles spent trying
and Merge join implicitly eliminate the non-joining children.
2. We need a way to push join down append path, which PostgreSQL doesn't do
today.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
Right now, constraint exclusion code looks only at the provided
conditions.
If we want avoid table scan based on constraints in the above example, it
will need to look
in parsenodes.h
---
Only the newly added char *inp_str(that is different from ANALYZE) value
is NULL. I was able to retrieve the column name from va_cols.
Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
--
Regards,
Ashoke
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB
, corresponding _copy* is the
first suspect. You may be able find why it worked in command line and why
not through the connector by breaking on copyObject() in either cases.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
You may have to add code to copy
to have attr_needed for child rels.
regards, tom lane
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/06/30 20:17), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
(2014/06/30 17:47), Ashutosh Bapat wrote
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/07/01 15:13), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp mailto:fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
We may want to modify use_physical_tlist
...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/06/24 16:30), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
(2014/06/23 18:35), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
Selecting tableoid on parent causes an error, ERROR: cannot extract
system attribute from virtual tuple. The foreign table has an OID which
can be reported as tableoid for the rows coming
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp
wrote:
(2014/06/30 17:47), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
I checked that it's reporting the right tableoid now.
Thank you for the check.
BTW, why aren't you using the tlist passed to this function? I guess
of v11 up to the current master.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
Let me bring the bug fix again to the surface. Is anybody looking at this
fix?
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Hi,
When array of char * is used as target for the FETCH statement returning
more than one row, it tries to store all
. While reading array of char pointer in ecpg_do_prologue(), use the
address instead of the value at that address
3. The pointer arithmetic should treat such variable as char **, instead of
char *
ECPG regression tests do not show any failures with this patch.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
801 - 900 of 965 matches
Mail list logo
