Thanks.. I'll keep those issues in mind.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
Well, you'd have to start by demonstrating the benefit of it. The
advantage of query caches in proxies and clients is well-known, because
you
can offload some of the work
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Billy,
I've done a brief search of the postgresql mail archives, and I've
noticed a few projects for adding query caches to postgresql, (for
example, Masanori Yamazaki's query cache proposal for GSOC 2011),
...
code? Anyone aware of a project trying to
accomplish this?
Thanks!
Billy Earney
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The complication, opportunities for bugs, and general slowdown
associated with that would outweigh any possible gain, in the opinion
of most hackers who
Jay,
Good links, and I've also looked at a few others with benchmarks. I
believe most of the benchmarks are done before PCRE implemented jit. I
haven't found a benchmark with jit enabled, so I'm not sure if it will make
a difference. Also I'm not sure how accurately the benchmarks will show
:
Billy Earney billy.ear...@gmail.com writes:
Also would it be possible to set a session variable (lets say
PGREGEXTYPE)
and set it to ARE (current alg), RE2, or PCRE, that way users could
choose
which implementation they want (unless we find a single implementation
that
beats the others
didn't
download and analyze their code, but maybe they have made some comments
that could help, or maybe have some improvements to the code..
Just a thought.. :)
Billy Earney
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com writes:
Are you far
library? It seems to have a lot of neat features, and also has a jit, and
it looks like it is being actively maintained and has decent comments.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Billy Earney billy.ear...@gmail.com writes:
I did a google search, and found
