On 5/2/06, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 00:27 -0500, Brandon Black wrote:
> I tried things like the above with small test data sets against cvs
> just now on my home machine, and constraint exclusion doesn't seem to
> apply here (even if all
On 4/30/06, Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Brandon Black wrote:
> I dug around in CVS to have a look for this, and I did eventually find
> it (well, I found the corresponding docs patch that removed the note
> about not working for joins). I s
On 4/27/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Brandon Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering (for planning purposes) if anyone knew the status of
> constraint exclusions moving up to query runtime and working for
> joins.
The latter, done; the
I was wondering (for planning purposes) if anyone knew the status of
constraint exclusions moving up to query runtime and working for
joins. Is this something that's coming down the pipe in the
foreseeable future, or just on a back-burner to-do list, or probably
never happening, or... ?
I have a
