Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign

2003-03-19 Thread Brian Bruns
On 16 Mar 2003, Hannu Krosing wrote: > Tom Lane kirjutas R, 14.03.2003 kell 19:15: > > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > So, just to throw out a wild idea: If you're talking about making large > > > changes to the on-the-wire protocol. Have you considered using an existing > > > databas

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port patches submitted

2003-01-21 Thread Brian Bruns
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows anyway. They just all download the binary a guy (usually literally "one guy") built. So, let's just make sure that one guy has cygwin loaded on his machine and we'll be all set. Sorry, couldn't help myself...Seriously, it's a cultural thing, I w

Re: [HACKERS] 7.3 schedule

2002-04-14 Thread Brian Bruns
On 13 Apr 2002, Hannu Krosing wrote: > On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 03:04, Brian Bruns wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2002, Hannu Krosing wrote: > > > > > IIRC someone started work on modularising the network-related parts with > > > a goal of supporting DRDA (DB2 protocol) an

Re: [HACKERS] 7.3 schedule

2002-04-11 Thread Brian Bruns
On 11 Apr 2002, Hannu Krosing wrote: > IIRC someone started work on modularising the network-related parts with > a goal of supporting DRDA (DB2 protocol) and others in future. That was me, although I've been bogged down lately, and haven't been able to get back to it. DRDA, btw, is not just a